On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 1:51 AM, Michael Snow wikipe...@verizon.net wrote:
Given that background, I would conclude that neither of the current
options is desirable, and we need to develop a new Wiktionary logo.
Yes, that's what Cary brought up. :-) On
2009/3/26 Casey Brown cbrown1023...@gmail.com:
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 1:51 AM, Michael Snow wikipe...@verizon.net wrote:
My own suggestion would be to use
individual blocks but to have them be like type pieces from a printing
press.
Though actual proposals for new logos will be accepted
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 5:20 PM, Cary Bass c...@wikimedia.org wrote:
I understand that there are complaints that new logo has elements too
closely resembling Scrabble pieces, or are otherwise too cartooned to
some. The new logo does maintain some visual identity as a project
logo, while the
I agree with Austin. We cannot just force communities to adopt this new thing.
Lets try for a clean start.
From: Austin Hair adh...@gmail.com
To: Wikimedia Foundation Mailing List foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2009 5:30:08 PM
On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 7:34 AM, Casey Brown cbrown1023...@gmail.com wrote:
My own suggestion would be to use
individual blocks but to have them be like type pieces from a printing
press.
Though actual proposals for new logos will be accepted later (once it
is decided how things will work),
