As an attempt to revive and reform the new project policy page on meta
(http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/New_project_policy), the content scope task
force at strategy.wikimedia.org has written a new draft.
Feedback, additions and changes to that page is very much appreciated. The
draft is found
Samuel Klein meta...@... writes:
Ram, thanks for sharing your interesting project.
|
| On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 7:15 PM, Platonides platoni...@... wrote:
|
| Librelist is a free as in freedom mailing list site for open source
| projects. It is a place for FOSS communities to discuss all the
On 04/29/2010 06:32 PM, Tim Starling wrote:
William Pietri wrote:
As requested, here's the weekly Flagged Protection update.
We continue to work on UI display issues and on getting up a Labs
version of the German Wikipedia. We're pretty close to release, and we
believe only minor UI
On 29 April 2010 22:24, William Pietri will...@scissor.com wrote:
As requested, here's the weekly Flagged Protection update.
We continue to work on UI display issues and on getting up a Labs
version of the German Wikipedia. We're pretty close to release, and we
believe only minor UI issues
On 04/30/2010 03:28 PM, Thomas Dalton wrote:
On 29 April 2010 22:24, William Pietriwill...@scissor.com wrote:
As requested, here's the weekly Flagged Protection update.
We continue to work on UI display issues and on getting up a Labs
version of the German Wikipedia. We're pretty close
On 1 May 2010 00:06, William Pietri will...@scissor.com wrote:
Hi. Thanks for the comment.
Just to be clear, we didn't completely ignore that comment, or any
other; we've been going through the comments on phone meetings every
week. We did, however, fail to respond to that one, which I'm
William,
You thanked Thomas three times in that e-mail. If I may say so, such
courtesy is unwarranted, in light of the terseness of his most recent
post. We're all volunteers, so colour me confused as to why people
think head-biting will achieve anything.
YMMV.
Anthony
On 1 May 2010 00:50, Anthony wiki...@googlemail.com wrote:
William,
You thanked Thomas three times in that e-mail. If I may say so, such
courtesy is unwarranted, in light of the terseness of his most recent
post. We're all volunteers, so colour me confused as to why people
think head-biting
My understanding is that William is being paid.
Seriously? Well, okay then. If that's what our grants are being spent on…
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
On 04/30/2010 04:55 PM, Thomas Dalton wrote:
You thanked Thomas three times in that e-mail. If I may say so, such
courtesy is unwarranted, in light of the terseness of his most recent
post. We're all volunteers, so colour me confused as to why people
think head-biting will achieve anything.
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 5:01 PM, Anthony wiki...@googlemail.com wrote:
My understanding is that William is being paid.
Seriously? Well, okay then. If that's what our grants are being spent on…
Jeez, does it matter? If William's style is to deal with cranky
comments by being as polite as
On 1 May 2010 01:14, William Pietri will...@scissor.com wrote:
On 04/30/2010 04:55 PM, Thomas Dalton wrote:
You thanked Thomas three times in that e-mail. If I may say so, such
courtesy is unwarranted, in light of the terseness of his most recent
post. We're all volunteers, so colour me
On 04/30/2010 05:19 PM, Thomas Dalton wrote:
I'm intrigued by the notion that you don't have to be nice to people
that are paid to deal with you. Since I gave the foundation a 70%
discount from my normal rates, perhaps you can shoot for a mix of 70%
courtesy and 30% head-biting?
On 1 May 2010 01:32, William Pietri will...@scissor.com wrote:
You should keep in mind that it definitely takes me more time and more
energy to deal with non-nice requests.
Really? How does me adding more words to my emails save you time?
___
On 04/30/2010 05:37 PM, Thomas Dalton wrote:
On 1 May 2010 01:32, William Pietriwill...@scissor.com wrote:
You should keep in mind that it definitely takes me more time and more
energy to deal with non-nice requests.
Really? How does me adding more words to my emails save you
On 1 May 2010 02:23, William Pietri will...@scissor.com wrote:
As long as we're on the topic of etiquette, I find it frustrating when
people pick out one particular bit to reply to and ignore the broader
point. I add that only because I'm not sure if this was part of your
intentional policy
(Sorry for top-posting: Blackberry.)
I just want to add a brief note supporting what William's saying. Yes -- it
definitely takes more time to respond to angry or hostile-seeming mails. Trust
gets impaired, and so the respondent spends time trying to figure out whether
the person's really
Can anyone remind me what the per day and per month post limits are,
and confirm that someone is still keeping track?
We've established in the past that a collegial atmosphere is desired
by the people who post to and read this list. Some have never agreed,
but that is why some have previously
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Respect.
If you can't, use private mail.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJL25CxAAoJEHCAuDvx9Z6LC8MIANso1Zh8avMk3EAeYwtZ4Tse
19 matches
Mail list logo
