On 7 March 2012 07:23, Amir E. Aharoni amir.ahar...@mail.huji.ac.il wrote:
I'm taking a hint from Clay Shirky's books here: What most people
would consider high quality published sources - in this case, by
railway companies, governments, standards institutions or engineering
colleges - simply
On Wed, 7 Mar 2012 09:10:17 +, geni geni...@gmail.com wrote:
On 7 March 2012 07:23, Amir E. Aharoni amir.ahar...@mail.huji.ac.il
wrote:
I'm taking a hint from Clay Shirky's books here: What most people
would consider high quality published sources - in this case, by
railway companies,
Hello everybody,
starting from now the german chapter report february is available.You'll
find it via meta wiki:
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_chapters/Reports/Wikimedia_Deutschland
Sorry for bothering you to do another klick to reach the report. It's to
extensive to paste it in the
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 6:30 PM, Kat Walsh k...@mindspillage.org wrote:
...
Sorry to drag this out--there are definitely more interesting things
to talk about. But as someone who basically holds Phoebe's position on
the issue I'd like to say what I am thinking also.
I think, in fact, that I
Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2012 21:30:27 -0500
From: Kat Walsh k...@mindspillage.org
To: Wikimedia Foundation Mailing List
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Subject: Re: [Foundation-l] Controversial content software status
Message-ID:
Andreas, you seem really maniac fixed to this theme. I am since 7 years in
Wikipedia and never saw this pictures.
For me are pictures from tortured persons, from war and weapons torn bodies
and shot heads a much more terrifying that sex-pics (I spare posting
spectacular links, just for attending
2012/3/7 Juliana da Costa José julianadacostaj...@googlemail.com:
Andreas, you seem really maniac fixed to this theme. I am since 7 years in
Wikipedia and never saw this pictures.
For me are pictures from tortured persons, from war and weapons torn bodies
and shot heads a much more terrifying
Hi Phoebe,
so it would be not longer possible too, to have medical pictures f.e. from
surgeries, organs or corpses, because they could frighten people?
Best
Juliana
2012/3/7 phoebe ayers phoebe.w...@gmail.com
2012/3/7 Juliana da Costa José julianadacostaj...@googlemail.com:
Andreas, you
2012/3/7 Juliana da Costa José julianadacostaj...@googlemail.com:
so it would be not longer possible too, to have medical pictures f.e. from
surgeries, organs or corpses, because they could frighten people?
Knowledge is an inherently frightening thing, as is the prospect of
other people
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 9:37 PM, Arne Klempert klempert.li...@gmail.comwrote:
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 6:24 PM, Florence Devouard anthe...@yahoo.com
wrote:
Please find on Wikimedia France position regarding chapter fundraising in
France in the coming years.
Wikimedia UK's response to the
on 3/7/12 12:52 PM, Juliana da Costa José at
julianadacostaj...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi Phoebe,
so it would be not longer possible too, to have medical pictures f.e. from
surgeries, organs or corpses, because they could frighten people?
Best
Juliana
2012/3/7 Juliana da Costa José
quote
* They have to do lots of original research; it is impossible
to follow development of the railway infrastructure and
operations using only high quality published sources;
* They got bitten a bit by the notability discussions in their
field; they want to document every track, every
On 3/7/12 6:52 PM, Juliana da Costa José wrote:
so it would be not longer possible too, to have medical pictures f.e. from
surgeries, organs or corpses, because they could frighten people?
I don't think anyone's proposing that the information should be removed
from articles; just that there
Juliana,
You simply don't understand where I am coming from.
I have nothing against Wikimedia websites hosting adult content, just like
I have nothing against the far greater amounts of explicit adult material
on Flickr for example. What saddens me though is that Wikimedia is unable
to grow up,
On 7 March 2012 22:41, Andreas Kolbe jayen...@gmail.com wrote:
WMF is looking to work together with lots of mainstream organisations, from
the British Museum to the Smithsonian. But this kind of curation of adult
content is an embarrassment for the Wikimedia Foundation, and a potential
On 7 Mar 2012, at 23:03, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote:
On 7 March 2012 22:41, Andreas Kolbe jayen...@gmail.com wrote:
WMF is looking to work together with lots of mainstream organisations, from
the British Museum to the Smithsonian. But this kind of curation of adult
content is an
On 7 Mar 2012, at 23:16, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote:
On 7 March 2012 23:08, Thomas Morton morton.tho...@googlemail.com wrote:
On 7 Mar 2012, at 23:03, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote:
I think you have no grasp of just how far beyond merely mainstream
Wikipedia is.
The answer
Am 07.03.2012 23:41, schrieb Andreas Kolbe:
Juliana,
You simply don't understand where I am coming from.
I have nothing against Wikimedia websites hosting adult content, just like
I have nothing against the far greater amounts of explicit adult material
on Flickr for example. What saddens me
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 11:46 PM, Tobias Oelgarte
tobias.oelga...@googlemail.com wrote:
Am 07.03.2012 23:41, schrieb Andreas Kolbe:
Sorry to interrupt you. But as i can see, you constantly rage against
sexuality in any form. I came to this little conclusion because i saw never
an example from
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 4:30 AM, Kat Walsh k...@mindspillage.org wrote:
Sorry to drag this out--there are definitely more interesting things
to talk about. But as someone who basically holds Phoebe's position on
the issue I'd like to say what I am thinking also.
definetely more interesting
Am 08.03.2012 01:53, schrieb Andreas Kolbe:
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 11:46 PM, Tobias Oelgarte
tobias.oelga...@googlemail.com wrote:
Am 07.03.2012 23:41, schrieb Andreas Kolbe:
Sorry to interrupt you. But as i can see, you constantly rage against
sexuality in any form. I came to this little
Andreas, I do not know from where you come from, But I tell you, from where
I come: My worked for the Vatikan and we had several preachers in our house
who had all a special sound in their voice. This special slobbery
smart-aleck when they spoke about the depravity of the humanity with
special
If you search for devoirs (= homework) or vacances (= holiday) on
French Wikipedia, you're presented with a porn video in which a man and a
woman engage in sex acts (cunnilingus and fellatio) with a dog.
MZMcBride wrote:
Kat: Thank you for weighing in. I know many people appreciated hearing from
you, Phoebe, and some of the other big voices who have commented here. And
I think some of the replies in this thread have gone a long way to helping
ease some tensions and create better dialogue. :-)
If you search for devoirs (= homework) or vacances (= holiday) on
French Wikipedia, you're presented with a porn video in which a man and a
woman engage in sex acts (cunnilingus and fellatio) with a dog.
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 3:00 AM, phoebe ayers phoebe.w...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi MZ and all --
Project development was put on hold over the winter in favor of more
pressing priorities, with the agreement of the Board. There is
currently an open proposal on the table for the Board to vote on
Andreas: I think
http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/foundation-l/2012-March/072463.html
is
one of my favorite posts to foundation-l ever. I'll go add these
examples
to
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Controversial_content/Problems now.
MZMcBride
I just suggested to rename the file
On 8 March 2012 07:13, Jussi-Ville Heiskanen cimonav...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 3:00 AM, phoebe ayers phoebe.w...@gmail.com wrote:
So, yeah, things are on hold essentially because there are more urgent
things to do, and because given the rather extraordinary scale of the
28 matches
Mail list logo
