A pet peeve of mine; I don't think telling anyone what THEY know or
don't know over the internet is worthwhile in most cases.
-Dan
On Apr 14, 2009, at 1:13 PM, Brian wrote:
the archives are mostly useless as a knowledge base.
This is false and you know it. Several of these questions *have*
Just a point of information: Her name is Naoko Komura, not Naoki Kimura.
-Dan
On Mar 31, 2009, at 6:23 PM, Ziko van Dijk wrote:
Hello,
A couple of days ago I have contacted our project manager in San
Francisco
who is dealing with the improvement of the usability of Wikipedia. I
have
Fail reading comprehension is fail.
I submit myself to lose.
-Dan
On Mar 31, 2009, at 8:34 PM, Casey Brown wrote:
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 8:32 PM, Dan Rosenthal
swatjes...@gmail.com wrote:
Just a point of information: Her name is Naoko Komura, not Naoki
Kimura.
*cough* It's not real
On Feb 24, 2009, at 12:52 PM, Al Tally wrote:
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 4:09 PM, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com
wrote:
http://xkcd.com/547/
- d.
Eh I'm sure this was discussed somewhere already... anyway, it
brought a ton
of new editors in, which was both good and bad (we
Which is more likely to happen in some countries than others.
Though, I do agree that it is a silly reason to oppose in light of his
quite reasonable concessions.
-Dan
On Feb 10, 2009, at 5:26 AM, Muhammad Alsebaey wrote:
I would say the likelihood of him being the target of the Iranian
This indeed. Good for them for dealing with these issues in advance
rather than waiting until the need for a crat is critical.
-Dan
On Jan 27, 2009, at 1:03 PM, Muhammad Alsebaey wrote:
+1 on them having their own crat and admins since they were
approved, what
possible harm could that
: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
--
Dan Rosenthal
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
--
Dan Rosenthal
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
Anecdotally, I thought it was about the same, but I did notice a LOT
more questioning of what the money was going to. Like you, just
impressions, no facts to back it up.
-Dan
On Jan 7, 2009, at 6:15 PM, Mathias Schindler wrote:
On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 11:57 PM, Brian
I don't think this is entirely accurate. For instance, there was the
annual report several months ago noting that we had shared some office
space with them. That was relevant to this list.
-Dan
On Jan 4, 2009, at 7:53 PM, Tim Starling wrote:
Brock Weller wrote:
Don't know how linked we
I think perhaps the intent was to get English and Irish editors
involved. This has been on and off of the noticeboards at
en.wikipedia.org multiple times, through Arbcom at least once, etc.
-Dan
On Nov 26, 2008, at 9:25 AM, effe iets anders wrote:
As Michael Bimmler suggested, I think too
Outside of those involved, I don't think many harbor those same
illusions here either.
-Dan
On Nov 26, 2008, at 11:50 AM, Christiano Moreschi wrote:
Amusing. I am strongly reminded of the fights over Macedonia and
Liancourt Rocks. Except on those occasions nobody had any illusions
that
101 - 112 of 112 matches
Mail list logo
