I doubt it will generate enough interest this time around. Many of us are just
tired of seeing this proposal (and its variants) dragging on and on, to the
point that we just don't bother to show up and say no.
Andrew
Fill the world with children who care and things start looking up.
Wikispecies will have a niche if it can prove to be regularly on the
leading edge.
Has there been any discussions about putting newly described species
onto the front page? If the information is made accessible, Wikinews
editors could write up stories about new discoveries.
Too many new
We always wanted to collaborate with scientific journals and projects,
regardless of its size. But remember that we can't use EOL images unless
they're from Flickr or Wikipedia, which means we probably have uploaded them to
Commons already.
Perhaps we should give the Main Page a facelift,
Full disclaimer: I contribute in Wikispecies.
First, calling a project as zero quality project, whether it belongs to WMF
or Wikia or somewhere else, is downright assuming bad faith. Second, all of the
discussion links in your boycott section took place in 2005 and 2006, clearly
unable to
Opps, used wrong subject line. So here's what I said about Wikispecies.
From: andrewcle...@hotmail.com
To: foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 13:49:36 -0400
Subject: Re: [Foundation-l] Raw data of 2009 Board election ballots
Full disclaimer: I contribute in
I don't mind repeating again. EOL boasts to have large amount of images, but do
you know that according to some of EOL's partner projects, EOL has not handled
any data submitted by its partners for over a year ago? Yes, they do have lots
and lots of images but many are simply sitting in a hard
