Re: [Foundation-l] On curiosity, cats and scapegoats

2011/9/9 Jimmy Wales jwa...@wikia-inc.com: If you don't like the feature, then don't use it. You talk like the filter existence is fait accompli, a matter already decided, and there is nothing people can do about it. The referendum also gave this impression, by asking things about its details

Re: [Foundation-l] hiding interlanguage links by default is a Bad Idea, part 2

/List_of_international_common_standards If those (and others) were properly used on Wikipedia menus, it would be more accessible to people with poor English skills. ] -- Elias Gabriel Amaral da Silva tolkiend...@gmail.com ___ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l

Re: [Foundation-l] Visual impairment

ourselves that way, captchas are so annoying.. [ but yeah, not open source, also not everyone trusts google ] -- Elias Gabriel Amaral da Silva tolkiend...@gmail.com ___ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https

Re: [Foundation-l] Spectrum of views (was Re: Sexual Imagery on Commons: where the discussion is happening)

-america editor managed to clean some articles for the casual reader? :) [ You might replace pro-america to anti-pornography as well - that's how I would see it ] -- Elias Gabriel Amaral da Silva tolkiend...@gmail.com ___ foundation-l mailing list foundation

Re: [Foundation-l] Spectrum of views (was Re: Sexual Imagery on Commons: where the discussion is happening)

be wrong of course. Interesting. Why do you think so? -- Elias Gabriel Amaral da Silva tolkiend...@gmail.com ___ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l

Re: [Foundation-l] Sexual Imagery on Commons: where the discussion is happening

Amaral da Silva tolkiend...@gmail.com ___ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l

Re: [Foundation-l] Filtering ourselves is pointless

there, but I see this kind of image on diaper commercials too, and some other infant products. They are being REALLY mean. -- Elias Gabriel Amaral da Silva tolkiend...@gmail.com ___ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe

Re: [Foundation-l] Sexual Imagery on Commons: where the discussion is happening

think some projects (like the English Wikipedia) already reached consensus on this issue. -- Elias Gabriel Amaral da Silva tolkiend...@gmail.com ___ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman

Re: [Foundation-l] Jimbo's Sexual Image Deletions

received multiple death threats, and the director of a short documentary her wrote was killed). I would show opposition to this kind of deletion, but just because I'm a lot influenced by her (and dislike deletionism in general) [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vaccine_Revolt -- Elias Gabriel Amaral

Re: [Foundation-l] Jimbo's Sexual Image Deletions

2010/5/10 Elias Gabriel Amaral da Silva tolkiend...@gmail.com: I sincerely don't personally care much about Muhammad pictures, for example. If people decided to delete them, I would simply think they are too afraid of offending, but I wouldn't care that much. (I know that being very notable

Re: [Foundation-l] Jimbo's Sexual Image Deletions

editors, admins, bureaucrats, etc. I must say that images of Muhammad is not being deleted *just because Jimmy is not Muslim*. -- Elias Gabriel Amaral da Silva tolkiend...@gmail.com ___ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org