Hi Ting,
Thanks for explaining the position of the board in your own words. I
appreciate the board is listening. I am concerned that you state that
the board is acting from belief, I recommend you consider how this
can move to proposing a strategy based on facts and non-controversial
analysis.
I
* Sue Gardner wrote:
Please read Ting's note carefully. The Board is asking me to work with
the community to develop a solution that meets the original
requirements as laid out in its resolution. It is asking me to do
something. But it is not asking me to do the specific thing that has
been
On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 10:12 PM, Bob the Wikipedian
bobthewikiped...@gmail.com wrote:
Since no one has explicitly come out and said exactly what the issue is
here, I'll ask:
*What exactly is harmful about an opt-in filter? *If it's opt-in, then
you have the choice to not even enable it if you
On Sun, Oct 09, 2011 at 09:19:40AM -0700, Sue Gardner wrote:
The Board is hoping there is a solution that will 1) enable readers to
easily hide images they don't want to see, as laid out in the Board's
resolution [1], while 2) being generally acceptable to editors. Maybe
this will not be
I'm all for it, too.
Bob
On 10/9/2011 6:31 PM, Kim Bruning wrote:
On Sun, Oct 09, 2011 at 09:19:40AM -0700, Sue Gardner wrote:
The Board is hoping there is a solution that will 1) enable readers to
easily hide images they don't want to see, as laid out in the Board's
resolution [1], while 2)
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 2:31 AM, Kim Bruning k...@bruning.xs4all.nl wrote:
On Sun, Oct 09, 2011 at 09:19:40AM -0700, Sue Gardner wrote:
The Board is hoping there is a solution that will 1) enable readers to
easily hide images they don't want to see, as laid out in the Board's
resolution [1],
Sue Gardner wrote:
The Board is hoping there is a solution that will 1) enable readers to
easily hide images they don't want to see, as laid out in the Board's
resolution [1], while 2) being generally acceptable to editors. Maybe
this will not be possible, but it's the goal.
As I've noted in
On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 9:10 AM, MZMcBride z...@mzmcbride.com wrote:
David Gerard wrote:
On 9 October 2011 14:18, Thomas Dalton thomas.dal...@gmail.com wrote:
On 9 October 2011 13:55, Ting Chen tc...@wikimedia.org wrote:
The majority of editors who responded to the referendum are not opposed
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 6:13 AM, David Levy lifeisunf...@gmail.com wrote:
Sue Gardner wrote:
The Board is hoping there is a solution that will 1) enable readers to
easily hide images they don't want to see, as laid out in the Board's
resolution [1], while 2) being generally acceptable to
On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 14:55, Ting Chen tc...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Dear Wikimedia community,
First, I want to thank the 24,000 editors who participated in the
Wikimedia Foundation's referendum on the proposed personal image hiding
feature. We are particularly grateful to the nearly seven
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 6:47 AM, phoebe ayers phoebe.w...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 9:10 AM, MZMcBride z...@mzmcbride.com wrote:
David Gerard wrote:
On 9 October 2011 14:18, Thomas Dalton thomas.dal...@gmail.com wrote:
On 9 October 2011 13:55, Ting Chen tc...@wikimedia.org wrote:
201 - 211 of 211 matches
Mail list logo
