Oh, that discussion again. Try harder, German style
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Wikipedia_%E2%80%93_Die_freie_Enzyklop%C3%A4die_1269203954464.png
http://de.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_Diskussion:Hauptseite/alt3diff=prevoldid=72174091
2012/2/7 MZMcBride z...@mzmcbride.com
On 7 February 2012 04:49, MZMcBride z...@mzmcbride.com wrote:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Main_Page#Bad_choice_of_featured_article
is pretty good reading.
The complaints usually sums as 'hey, great work on that article,
unfortunately, I am a bit uncomfortable with subject at hand, so
On 07/02/12 22:13, Svip wrote:
On 7 February 2012 04:49, MZMcBride z...@mzmcbride.com wrote:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Main_Page#Bad_choice_of_featured_article
is pretty good reading.
The complaints usually sums as 'hey, great work on that article,
unfortunately, I am a bit
Some FAs should never be shown on the main page.
Nothing in the FA criteria says anything about the subject of the
article: such as whether the subject is of broad interest or has
educational merit. Such criteria should be considered for choosing
articles to show on the main page. The main
2012/2/7 Svip svi...@gmail.com:
On 7 February 2012 04:49, MZMcBride z...@mzmcbride.com wrote:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Main_Page#Bad_choice_of_featured_article
is pretty good reading.
The complaints usually sums as 'hey, great work on that article,
unfortunately, I am a bit
2012/2/7 HaeB haebw...@gmail.com
2012/2/7 Svip svi...@gmail.com:
On 7 February 2012 04:49, MZMcBride z...@mzmcbride.com wrote:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Main_Page#Bad_choice_of_featured_article
is pretty good reading.
The complaints usually sums as 'hey, great work on that
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 8:50 AM, emijrp emi...@gmail.com wrote:
2012/2/7 HaeB haebw...@gmail.com
Actually, the English Wikipedia's Featured Article Director
What is that?
has stated
himself
Why are not that decissions taken under community consensus?
that some articles will not
On Feb 7, 2012 1:50 PM, emijrp emi...@gmail.com wrote:
Why are not that decissions taken under community consensus?
that some articles will not be featured on the main page
(although he prefers to keep that list short and it currently consists
only of the article Jenna Jameson):
On 7 February 2012 17:03, Thomas Dalton thomas.dal...@gmail.com wrote:
He's been doing it for years and has never screwed up badly enough for the
community to take the job away from him. It's as simple as that. The
Wikipedia community can be uncharacteristically pragmatic at times!
I note
On 7 February 2012 17:03, Thomas Dalton thomas.dal...@gmail.com wrote:
He's been doing it for years and has never screwed up badly enough for
the
community to take the job away from him. It's as simple as that. The
Wikipedia community can be uncharacteristically pragmatic at times!
I note
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 10:51 PM, Fred Bauder fredb...@fairpoint.net wrote:
Casting aside the infantile slogan, Wikipedia is not censored, I think
having the pilot of South Park on the Main Page is quite appropriate; the
subject is significant.
Fred
Really, It's not that much different than
On 08/02/12 09:09, K. Peachey wrote:
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 10:51 PM, Fred Bauder fredb...@fairpoint.net wrote:
Casting aside the infantile slogan, Wikipedia is not censored, I think
having the pilot of South Park on the Main Page is quite appropriate; the
subject is significant.
Fred
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Main_Page#Bad_choice_of_featured_article
is pretty good reading.
MZMcBride
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
13 matches
Mail list logo
