Kropotkine_113 wrote:
Thank you very much all of you (Brigitte SB, Ting Chen, Mickael Snow and
others).
To close my participation in this thread I just add three points :
...
- Even more important point is the cultural gap between Foundation's
intentions and communication, which are very
2009/8/28 Florence Devouard anthe...@yahoo.com:
First because it requires the chapter to actually agree to a certain
degree with the action of the Wikimedia Foundation.
I would prefer it if the WMF didn't do things the chapters don't agree
with. If the chapters make their decisions based on
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 5:01 PM, Florence Devouardanthe...@yahoo.com wrote:
Using the chapters as intermediaries between the Wikimedia Foundation
and the communities is actually a solution that has been used in the past.
It certainly feature a certain efficiency (proximity with the community
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 12:58 PM, Thomas Dalton thomas.dal...@gmail.comwrote:
2009/8/28 Florence Devouard anthe...@yahoo.com:
First because it requires the chapter to actually agree to a certain
degree with the action of the Wikimedia Foundation.
I would prefer it if the WMF didn't do
2009/8/28 Sebastian Moleski seb...@gmail.com:
I keep reading such statements and I'm having to admit: I have more and more
problems following your logic. Let's take this apart:
I think any response I can give will basically boil down to:
[D]emocracy is the worst form of government except all
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 2:01 PM, Thomas Dalton thomas.dal...@gmail.comwrote:
2009/8/28 Sebastian Moleski seb...@gmail.com:
I keep reading such statements and I'm having to admit: I have more and
more
problems following your logic. Let's take this apart:
I think any response I can give
2009/8/28 Sebastian Moleski seb...@gmail.com:
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 2:01 PM, Thomas Dalton thomas.dal...@gmail.comwrote:
2009/8/28 Sebastian Moleski seb...@gmail.com:
I keep reading such statements and I'm having to admit: I have more and
more
problems following your logic. Let's take
