What about changing it every hour? Then you have sufficient randomness over
time, and no flashy buttons.
-- eia
2009/7/21 Erik Moeller e...@wikimedia.org
2009/7/20 Liam Wyatt liamwy...@gmail.com:
Rotating them would seem like a more viable solution than randomised - We
don't want the
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 11:28 PM, Gregory Maxwellgmaxw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 2:15 AM, effe iets
anderseffeietsand...@gmail.com wrote:
What about changing it every hour? Then you have sufficient randomness over
time, and no flashy buttons.
You still have the problem that
Donate Now Every donation helps us to keep free for everyone.
Donate Now Keep Wikipedia free for everyone.
Is no one else concerned by the use of the word free in the message options
being tested. I wouldn't want these ambigous messages like these on the site
no matter if they beat out the no
on 7/21/09 10:33 AM, Birgitte SB at birgitte...@yahoo.com wrote:
Donate Now Every donation helps us to keep free for everyone.
Donate Now Keep Wikipedia free for everyone.
Is no one else concerned by the use of the word free in the message options
being tested. I wouldn't want these
I agree with this, and said so at the original discussion--where I
think the consensus was not to use that phrase.
David Goodman, Ph.D, M.L.S.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:DGG
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 10:39 AM, Marc
Riddellmichaeldavi...@comcast.net wrote:
on 7/21/09 10:33 AM,
Wikimedians--
As many of you know, last month we began work on exploring the
visibility of the donate button on all Wikimedia projects. After a long
comment period, we received many comments and many new ideas. Some of
these ideas we have incorporated into a new set of test buttons. Thank
you
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 4:50 PM, Rand Montoyarmont...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Wikimedians--
As many of you know, last month we began work on exploring the
visibility of the donate button on all Wikimedia projects. After a long
comment period, we received many comments and many new ideas. Some of
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 6:04 PM, Robert Rohde raro...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 4:50 PM, Rand Montoyarmont...@wikimedia.org
wrote:
Wikimedians--
As many of you know, last month we began work on exploring the
visibility of the donate button on all Wikimedia projects. After
2009/7/21 Robert Rohde raro...@gmail.com:
Testing should be done in parallel, not in sequence. History has
demonstrated that donors have a tendency to respond disproportionately
to the new thing. Which means that whatever button you test first
will have an advantage over whichever one you
2009/7/20 Liam Wyatt liamwy...@gmail.com:
Rotating them would seem like a more viable solution than randomised - We
don't want the situation where every new page in WP someone reads there is a
new/different coloured donation button where last week there was none at all
- to go from nothing to
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 9:19 PM, Erik Moellere...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Indeed, that's the reasoning behind the proposed approach. We don't
want it to typically be changing constantly for an individual user.
Yes, a sequential run does introduce various problematic biases.
An IP-address based
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 12:30 PM, Gregory Maxwell gmaxw...@gmail.comwrote:
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 9:19 PM, Erik Moellere...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Indeed, that's the reasoning behind the proposed approach. We don't
want it to typically be changing constantly for an individual user.
Yes, a
12 matches
Mail list logo
