Hoi,
The conditions have changed and consequently it should be clear that what we
did in the past has a reduced relevance for what we do in the future. When
material is not usable for our projects it has no place on Commons. One of
the reasons why I feel so strong about it are the people who promis
2009/6/27 Gerard Meijssen :
> It is not obvious because a viral license assumes that all other content
> will be contiminated with the same license. Hence when GFDL only is
> incompatlible with our projects this material cannot be used in our
> projects. This defeats the objective of Commons.
Mere
Hoi,
It is not obvious because a viral license assumes that all other content
will be contiminated with the same license. Hence when GFDL only is
incompatlible with our projects this material cannot be used in our
projects. This defeats the objective of Commons.
This should be obvious and hence it
Дана Friday 26 June 2009 18:02:57 Gerard Meijssen написа:
> Given that the GFDL is a viral license, it is not obvious that we should
> accept GFDL only material.
Does not follow.
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe
Hoi,
Given that the GFDL is a viral license, it is not obvious that we should
accept GFDL only material.
Thanks,
GerardM
2009/6/24 Pharos
> On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 11:57 AM, David Gerard wrote:
> > 2009/6/24 Pedro Sanchez :
> >
> >> With the license move...
> >> do we still accept GFDL-on
2009/6/24 David Gerard :
> 2009/6/24 Pedro Sanchez :
>
>> With the license move...
>> do we still accept GFDL-only material?
>> I've seen OTRSer today accepting and tagging entries released as GFDL only.
>
>
> Is this images for Commons? I'd personally like to deprecate the GFDL,
> but if it's a Co
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 1:13 PM, Michael Snow wrote:
> Pedro Sanchez wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 12:09 PM, Pharos >wrote:
> >
> >> Of course, there are and always have been a wide range of free content
> >> licenses used for images on Commons, not just GFDL and CC.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
2009/6/24 Michael Snow :
> Pedro Sanchez wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 12:09 PM, Pharos wrote:
>>
>>> Of course, there are and always have been a wide range of free content
>>> licenses used for images on Commons, not just GFDL and CC.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Pharos
>>>
>> OTRS doesn't handle only
Pedro Sanchez wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 12:09 PM, Pharos wrote:
>
>> Of course, there are and always have been a wide range of free content
>> licenses used for images on Commons, not just GFDL and CC.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Pharos
>>
> OTRS doesn't handle only commons.
>
> This meant wik
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 12:09 PM, Pharos wrote:
>
> Of course, there are and always have been a wide range of free content
> licenses used for images on Commons, not just GFDL and CC.
>
> Thanks,
> Pharos
>
OTRS doesn't handle only commons.
This meant wikipedia's text
__
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 10:57 AM, David Gerard wrote:
> 2009/6/24 Pedro Sanchez :
>
> > With the license move...
> > do we still accept GFDL-only material?
> > I've seen OTRSer today accepting and tagging entries released as GFDL
> only.
>
>
> Is this images for Commons? I'd personally like to de
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 11:57 AM, David Gerard wrote:
> 2009/6/24 Pedro Sanchez :
>
> > With the license move...
> > do we still accept GFDL-only material?
> > I've seen OTRSer today accepting and tagging entries released as GFDL
> only.
>
>
> Is this images for Commons? I'd personally like to de
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 11:57 AM, David Gerard wrote:
> 2009/6/24 Pedro Sanchez :
>
>> With the license move...
>> do we still accept GFDL-only material?
>> I've seen OTRSer today accepting and tagging entries released as GFDL only.
>
>
> Is this images for Commons? I'd personally like to deprecate
2009/6/24 Pedro Sanchez :
> With the license move...
> do we still accept GFDL-only material?
> I've seen OTRSer today accepting and tagging entries released as GFDL only.
Is this images for Commons? I'd personally like to deprecate the GFDL,
but if it's a Commons-accepted free content licence t
With the license move...
do we still accept GFDL-only material?
I've seen OTRSer today accepting and tagging entries released as GFDL only.
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/l
15 matches
Mail list logo
