Re: [Foundation-l] Jimmy Wales donation appeal

2008-12-24 Thread David Gerard
2008/12/24 Robert Rohde : > So, if not visibility, then what is really going on. In my opinion, > if you want someone to read something, personalizing it is a very good > idea. I think describing it as a personal message and putting a face > to it, provides engagement and gets people to pay atte

Re: [Foundation-l] Jimmy Wales donation appeal

2008-12-24 Thread Robert Rohde
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 5:59 PM, Erik Moeller wrote: > Within the last 24 hours, we've raised a total of $283,859. That's > more than 10 times as much as we made during a typical weekday in the > last few days of the fundraiser, and the single highest day on record > for community gifts. We don't

Re: [Foundation-l] Jimmy Wales donation appeal

2008-12-24 Thread toddmallen
It works and isn't terribly invasive, and realistically financial difficulty will find sympathy right now. I think it's brilliant. -Original Message- From: "Erik Moeller" Subj: Re: [Foundation-l] Jimmy Wales donation appeal Date: Tue Dec 23, 2008 7:00 pm Size:

Re: [Foundation-l] Jimmy Wales donation appeal

2008-12-23 Thread Pharos
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 8:59 PM, Erik Moeller wrote: > 2008/12/23 effe iets anders : >> Up to now, I kinda liked the fundraiser. Although they are very shouty for >> what I'm used to (I dislike the red button for instance and the somewhat >> agressive tone), I think this last change in message cou

Re: [Foundation-l] Jimmy Wales donation appeal

2008-12-23 Thread Erik Moeller
2008/12/23 effe iets anders : > Up to now, I kinda liked the fundraiser. Although they are very shouty for > what I'm used to (I dislike the red button for instance and the somewhat > agressive tone), I think this last change in message could use a *little* > step back. Please use a slightly smalle

Re: [Foundation-l] Jimmy Wales donation appeal

2008-12-23 Thread Anthony
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 9:56 PM, Gregory Maxwell wrote: > Although my own experience is that many Americans are a bit baffled > that we don't run ads. They've often not even heard the multitude of > arguments against pervasive/invasive advertising. I don't believe > it's Wikimedia's place to arg

Re: [Foundation-l] Jimmy Wales donation appeal

2008-12-23 Thread Ziko van Dijk
This is really impressive - such a rise in donations just because of a clear and personal approach! Can't we make more like this, personal testimonials and calls by Wikimedians but also non-Wikimedians sympathizing with us? Ziko 2008/12/23 Robert Rohde > Aside from concerns about loudness and

Re: [Foundation-l] Jimmy Wales donation appeal

2008-12-23 Thread Robert Rohde
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 4:48 AM, Robert Rohde wrote: > PS. At screen widths that are not all that small, it appears the > "collapse" button is forcing the "Please Read:" unit down a line so > the last line is hanging outside the box. I should say, that's on IE. Firefox doesn't seem to have that

Re: [Foundation-l] Jimmy Wales donation appeal

2008-12-23 Thread Robert Rohde
Aside from concerns about loudness and size in the banner, the message itself has been very successful: http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Special:FundraiserStatistics -Robert Rohde PS. At screen widths that are not all that small, it appears the "collapse" button is forcing the "Please Read:"

Re: [Foundation-l] Jimmy Wales donation appeal

2008-12-23 Thread Jon Harald Søby
2008/12/23 Petr Kadlec > 2008/12/23 effe iets anders : > > As said, a slightly smaller font, and a grey color could do miracles > here. > > Also, note that on IE7 in 1024x768, the banner (on Commons, at least) > looks terrible -- the last line ("Wikipedia Founder Jimmy Wales") goes > under the ba

Re: [Foundation-l] Jimmy Wales donation appeal

2008-12-23 Thread Petr Kadlec
2008/12/23 effe iets anders : > As said, a slightly smaller font, and a grey color could do miracles here. Also, note that on IE7 in 1024x768, the banner (on Commons, at least) looks terrible -- the last line ("Wikipedia Founder Jimmy Wales") goes under the banner border, so that it is stricken th

Re: [Foundation-l] Jimmy Wales donation appeal

2008-12-23 Thread effe iets anders
Up to now, I kinda liked the fundraiser. Although they are very shouty for what I'm used to (I dislike the red button for instance and the somewhat agressive tone), I think this last change in message could use a *little* step back. Please use a slightly smaller font, an slightly less shouty text.

Re: [Foundation-l] Jimmy Wales donation appeal

2008-12-22 Thread Gregory Maxwell
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 9:40 PM, Casey Brown wrote: > Some pretty nice comments mixed in there. ;-) They also do a good job > explaining why we need money. > > [Jay: interesting to look at, might be nice to use some like their > comments in the future] Some of it is just hopeless. "Why can't th

Re: [Foundation-l] Jimmy Wales donation appeal

2008-12-22 Thread Casey Brown
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 9:42 PM, Dan Collins wrote: > Wait. Is donating supposed to make the banner go away? > > Because it didn't... No, there's a gadget and a "collapse" (only makes it smaller) button for that. -- Casey Brown Cbrown1023 --- Note: This e-mail address is used for mailing

Re: [Foundation-l] Jimmy Wales donation appeal

2008-12-22 Thread Dan Collins
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 9:40 PM, Casey Brown wrote: > On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 9:34 PM, Chad wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 9:12 PM, geni wrote: > >> 2008/12/23 Robert Rohde : > >> > Looks like the new appeal is working well. > >> > > >> > We seem to be on pace to have the best single day of

Re: [Foundation-l] Jimmy Wales donation appeal

2008-12-22 Thread Casey Brown
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 9:34 PM, Chad wrote: > On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 9:12 PM, geni wrote: >> 2008/12/23 Robert Rohde : >> > Looks like the new appeal is working well. >> > >> > We seem to be on pace to have the best single day of this fund drive. >> > >> > -Robert Rohde >> > >> >> Not sure. Sti

Re: [Foundation-l] Jimmy Wales donation appeal

2008-12-22 Thread Chad
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 9:12 PM, geni wrote: > 2008/12/23 Robert Rohde : > > Looks like the new appeal is working well. > > > > We seem to be on pace to have the best single day of this fund drive. > > > > -Robert Rohde > > > > Not sure. Still getting complaints among others that donating doesn't

Re: [Foundation-l] Jimmy Wales donation appeal

2008-12-22 Thread geni
2008/12/23 Robert Rohde : > Looks like the new appeal is working well. > > We seem to be on pace to have the best single day of this fund drive. > > -Robert Rohde > Not sure. Still getting complaints among others that donating doesn't make the banner go away: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.ph

Re: [Foundation-l] Jimmy Wales donation appeal

2008-12-22 Thread Robert Rohde
Looks like the new appeal is working well. We seem to be on pace to have the best single day of this fund drive. -Robert Rohde On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 4:58 PM, Delirium wrote: > I assume most of you at least occasionally read one of the Wikimedia > websites so probably saw this in a sitenotice,

Re: [Foundation-l] Jimmy Wales donation appeal

2008-12-22 Thread geni
2008/12/23 Delirium : > Worriers about the perennial suggestions to put advertising somewhere on > the site(s) might also like what appears to be the closest to a no-ads > pledge I've seen so far: "Like a national park or a school, we don't > believe advertising should have a place in Wikipedia".

[Foundation-l] Jimmy Wales donation appeal

2008-12-22 Thread Delirium
I assume most of you at least occasionally read one of the Wikimedia websites so probably saw this in a sitenotice, but I thought it was a very well done appeal, concisely highlighting exactly what we do, why it's different than what most people do, and why we're worth donating to, so worth poi