Someone asked me a question on the French wikipedia and to be fair, I am
not sure what to answer.
The CURRENT text of the licencing proposition gives a link to
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
Whilst the text of the resolution adopted in december 2007
Florence Devouard wrote:
Someone asked me a question on the French wikipedia and to be fair, I am
not sure what to answer.
The CURRENT text of the licencing proposition gives a link to
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
Whilst the text of the resolution adopted in december
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 10:11 AM, Florence Devouard anthe...@yahoo.com wrote:
By the way, is that completely normal that the site notice on the
english wikipedia is occupied by Wikimania scholarship rather than by
the change of licence ?
With all due respect to Wikimania, it seems to me the
2009/4/20 Florence Devouard anthe...@yahoo.com:
Whilst the text of the resolution adopted in december 2007
http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Resolution:License_update
Refers to
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/us/
To my knowledge, the jurisdictional variant URL wasn't
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 12:11, Florence Devouard anthe...@yahoo.com wrote:
By the way, is that completely normal that the site notice on the
english wikipedia is occupied by Wikimania scholarship rather than by
the change of licence ?
With all due respect to Wikimania, it seems to me the
Jim Redmond wrote:
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 12:11, Florence Devouard anthe...@yahoo.com wrote:
By the way, is that completely normal that the site notice on the
english wikipedia is occupied by Wikimania scholarship rather than by
the change of licence ?
With all due respect to Wikimania,
