Hi all,
The Movement Roles Project (which you've probably heard about but are
not really sure what it is about [1]) continues to go forward. After
an in-person meeting two or so weeks ago, which produced a whole lot
of (interesting) notes [2], we're breaking down the main outcomes of
the meeting
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 1:54 PM, FT2 ft2.w...@gmail.com wrote:
Apologies for my unusual denseness here, but this matrix makes no sense to
me, and lacks any information needed for constructive improvement.
What I'd be looking for is a description of what the role and responsibility
is, in each
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 7:42 PM, Austin Hair adh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 1:54 PM, FT2 ft2.w...@gmail.com wrote:
Apologies for my unusual denseness here, but this matrix makes no sense
to
me, and lacks any information needed for constructive improvement.
What I'd be
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 4:44 PM, Theo10011 de10...@gmail.com wrote:
I left a message on the talk page about the definition of groups in the
context of Movement Roles Project last week. I also brought this up in the
IRC hour a week ago. I know the intention here is to be as inclusive as
The thing is, I don't understand what it's saying, or that it is providing
any framework or useful information on the point of what roles exist and
who's covering them how, to the point I actually can't contribute. It
appears to say nothing.
I'm sure that isn't the case, but it is incredibly rare
