Hoi,
The problem with precise definitions is that they are not necessarily known
and understood in this way by our audience. When you want people to give,
you want to appeal to people and get their money, you have to target and
emphasise the emotional side of the message. When you assume that
On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 7:26 PM, Thomas Dalton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And, in fact, wikimediafoundation.org says nonprofit charitable
organization. I don't know why people generally say non-profit
instead of charity, then - charity would be more precise and would
probably be better
And, in fact, wikimediafoundation.org says nonprofit charitable
organization. I don't know why people generally say non-profit
instead of charity, then - charity would be more precise and would
probably be better perceived.
I'm afraid I disagree with you here.
Non-profit vs for-profit is a
I do hope that WMF is a charity organization.
The last time I crossed the US-border in behalf of the Foundation I met
a border officer who indeed never heard anything of WikiMedia Foundation
or Wikipedia at all. And I had to explain her lengthy what the
foundation is. One of her question
On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 12:40 AM, Aphaia [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 6:40 AM, Thomas Dalton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
And, in fact, wikimediafoundation.org says nonprofit charitable
organization. I don't know why people generally say non-profit
instead of charity, then
hi,
a video showing how immune cells eat parasites [1] attracted quite
some sites to cite an article about medical visualization [2]. when
looking at it i noticed:
* that it is published in a cc-2.5 licensed journal
* that there is a possibility to enter links from facebook, stumble upon, ...
On 11/28/08, THURNER rupert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
some sites to cite an article about medical visualization [2]. when
looking at it i noticed:
* that it is published in a cc-2.5 licensed journal
* that there is a possibility to enter links from facebook, stumble upon,
...
* that there
Anthony wrote:
We determined that you are a public charity under the Code section(s)
listed in the heading of this letter [i.e. 170(b)(1)(A)(vi)].
I still have no opinion on what to call it. And I'll admit that despite the
fact that I said charity was a less precise term above (which I said
On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 11:03 AM, Ray Saintonge [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anthony wrote:
We determined that you are a public charity under the Code section(s)
listed in the heading of this letter [i.e. 170(b)(1)(A)(vi)].
I still have no opinion on what to call it. And I'll admit that despite
2008/11/28 Charlotte Webb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
It would be easy use javascript to fill out a {{cite news}} template
or whatever based on the url parameters. However the intersection of
sites we want to newcomers to easily link to and sites which take
us seriously enough to provide a url for
On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 6:42 PM, Finn Rindahl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It would take quite a lot of effort to change all
those nos throughout the wikimediaworld.
That shouldn't be necessary, there would be a redirect set-up.
--
Casey Brown
Cbrown1023
---
Note: This e-mail address is used
On Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 12:56 AM, Finn Rindahl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, I thought there already *was* a redirect set up, so that no in
interwikis etc really is a redirect to nb.
There is a redirect set up, but it goes in exactly the opposite direction.
--
André Engels, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
dear wiki
i'm sorry that i decide to unsubcribe from the list
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
13 matches
Mail list logo
