and the
purposes of the French government overlap, could the government be
considered as being the copyright holder.
L111-1:
http://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/affichCode.do?idSectionTA=LEGISCTA06161633cidTexte=LEGITEXT06069414dateTexte=20090926
L131-3-1:
http://www.legifrance.gouv.fr
Hello GerardM,
I follow you on the multilingual issue. Some of the manyfold copyright
symbols I quoted in my previous message might apply to the annotating
text, and let alive creative text writers have the possibility to sell
their text for money. But that should not allow them to add a
Hoi,
It used to be that when you added to the localisations at translatewiki.net,
it could take months before these localisations became part of any of the
WMF projects. This is no longer the case. From now on, your localisations
will become available in a much more timely manner. Typically
2009/9/26 Samuel Klein meta...@gmail.com:
Mike Godwin completed a first draft of the revised trademark policy.
- Nice. Does this mean we are closer to a world in which awesome
Wikimedia swag is easy to come by... and not through cafepress? [
sorry, CP! :) ]
The chapters still can't do
I think our prioritory focus should the Public Domain, not least
because the new (undisclosed yet) digital clause to be used on
French governement GLAM websites will be experimentally tested on the
website of the Claude Monet exhibition at Grand Palais in Paris from
October 2010 to January 2011.
2009/9/26 David Gerard dger...@gmail.com:
2009/9/26 Samuel Klein meta...@gmail.com:
Mike Godwin completed a first draft of the revised trademark policy.
- Nice. Does this mean we are closer to a world in which awesome
Wikimedia swag is easy to come by... and not through cafepress? [
sorry,
Hello,
Samuel Klein wrote:
A friend of mine at the Library of Congress is interested in engaging
local Wikipedians more in their efforts to contribute to Wikipedia.
continuing a first contact with WMF from years ago
It would be interesting if the LoC mentions the images which are
restored by
My reaction to this report is tears, because it is terrible : they use
the keyword public domain only once, talking about a set of 4500
American Library of Congress pictures on Flickr (1), only to
contradict it a few lines below when they talk about rights holder
for the works by Ingres (2), a
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 12:21 PM, Erik Moeller e...@wikimedia.org wrote:
with assessment spreadsheets and standardized project briefs
Do you have links for these?
Of course separately from setting priorities, there's the critical
need to improve our ability to execute upon those priorities.
On Sep 26, 2009, at 9:32 PM, Samuel Klein wrote:
Do you think we will be in a position to run a second usability
project of similar scope, two years from now, entirely from within the
community?
Are you sure that's the best option? Playing devil's advocate, does
doing something entirely
On Sat, Sep 26, 2009 at 11:20 PM, Philippe Beaudette
pbeaude...@wikimedia.org wrote:
On Sep 26, 2009, at 9:32 PM, Samuel Klein wrote:
Do you think we will be in a position to run a second usability
project of similar scope, two years from now, entirely from within the
community?
Are you
11 matches
Mail list logo
