My personal view on this John is that abstaining is appropriate in a couple
cases:
- you truly don't have an opinion and trust those who do have opinions to make
the decision. in that case it's really a decision to support the majority view
of the others who are voting.
- you don't
On 31 March 2012 06:45, John Vandenberg jay...@gmail.com wrote:
There is no requirement to know everything. There is a requirement to
make decisions in the best interests of the organisation, *as you see
it*. If a trustee persistently abstains on the big decisions because
they cant see *it*
On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 5:07 PM, Thomas Dalton thomas.dal...@gmail.com wrote:
On 31 March 2012 06:45, John Vandenberg jay...@gmail.com wrote:
There is no requirement to know everything. There is a requirement to
make decisions in the best interests of the organisation, *as you see
it*. If a
John Vandenberg, 31/03/2012 06:56:
On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 12:18 PM, Thomas Daltonthomas.dal...@gmail.com wrote:
On 31 March 2012 02:03, John Vandenbergjay...@gmail.com wrote:
I expect that the minutes will explain the varied positions of the
board. If not, then the board should put in
On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 5:56 AM, John Vandenberg jay...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 12:18 PM, Thomas Dalton thomas.dal...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 31 March 2012 02:03, John Vandenberg jay...@gmail.com wrote:
I expect that the minutes will explain the varied positions of the
board.
On 3/31/12 8:07 AM, Thomas Dalton wrote:
On 31 March 2012 06:45, John Vandenbergjay...@gmail.com wrote:
There is no requirement to know everything. There is a requirement to
make decisions in the best interests of the organisation, *as you see
it*. If a trustee persistently abstains on the
This is about what happens when someone does the *bloody simple and
obvious* with all the data that Facebook, FourSquare, etc. live of
getting people to give out:
Craig Franklin, 31/03/2012 23:20:
For the record, those who did not vote in favour of the resolutions, this
morning explained their reasons for doing so. I'm sure someone more
eloquent than I can summarise those reasons, but I think that they were
valid. John Vandenberg is correct that if
On 31 March 2012 22:33, Federico Leva (Nemo) nemow...@gmail.com wrote:
P.s.: It's a bit weird to focus so much on the reasons to oppose; why should
opposing be justified /more/ than supporting?
There's supposed to be a QA coming that will explain the supports.
Hi,
Through reports in the German Television I was made aware of the WikiData
project. This sounds really interesting. I could also find the press
announcement online. There was a reference to the European Union Project,
which seemed to be instrumental to kick this off: http://render-project.eu,
On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 11:40 PM, Thomas Dalton thomas.dal...@gmail.com wrote:
On 31 March 2012 22:33, Federico Leva (Nemo) nemow...@gmail.com wrote:
P.s.: It's a bit weird to focus so much on the reasons to oppose; why should
opposing be justified /more/ than supporting?
There's supposed to
11 matches
Mail list logo
