Re: [Foundation-l] foundation-l Digest, Vol 96, Issue 95

2012-04-01 Thread Federico Leva (Nemo)
phoebe ayers, 01/04/2012 07:49: In the meantime, if there are any questions for us (as a board) or for individual trustees I encourage you simply to send those along, either to me (if you want them to go to the whole board, as I will pass them along) or privately. That would help make sure that

Re: [Foundation-l] foundation-l Digest, Vol 96, Issue 95

2012-03-31 Thread Federico Leva (Nemo)
Craig Franklin, 31/03/2012 23:20: For the record, those who did not vote in favour of the resolutions, this morning explained their reasons for doing so. I'm sure someone more eloquent than I can summarise those reasons, but I think that they were valid. John Vandenberg is correct that if

Re: [Foundation-l] foundation-l Digest, Vol 96, Issue 95

2012-03-31 Thread Thomas Dalton
On 31 March 2012 22:33, Federico Leva (Nemo) nemow...@gmail.com wrote: P.s.: It's a bit weird to focus so much on the reasons to oppose; why should opposing be justified /more/ than supporting? There's supposed to be a QA coming that will explain the supports.

Re: [Foundation-l] foundation-l Digest, Vol 96, Issue 95

2012-03-31 Thread phoebe ayers
On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 11:40 PM, Thomas Dalton thomas.dal...@gmail.com wrote: On 31 March 2012 22:33, Federico Leva (Nemo) nemow...@gmail.com wrote: P.s.: It's a bit weird to focus so much on the reasons to oppose; why should opposing be justified /more/ than supporting? There's supposed to