Hi all,
Another administrative issue the Board needs to deal with, but vastly less
interesting or controversial than the one raised in my last email. :-)
The Board is planning to fix a minor but institutionalised problem with the
practice of selecting and current state of Foundation Board
On Tue, 2007-08-07 at 22:46 +1000, Jeff Waugh wrote:
[...] Cutting out the context to change the implied meaning.
1. Request a letter of resignation from Miguel (as that is the only way for
the office of President to become vacant)
Still president after all these years? Well done Miguel!
On 8/6/07, Havoc Pennington [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kjartan Maraas wrote:
Is there a rule of thumb as to how much code is contributed before this
applies? I've always assumed that writing new code gives you the right
to add yourself, but fixing bugs in existing code is a different matter?
Hi,
Jeff Waugh wrote:
So here's the proposal: I'd like to suggest we shift the election cycle back
six months, landing the process in May and June [1]. More controversially, I
reckon the best way to achieve this without a lot of pain would be to extend
the current Board's term by six months.
Hi,
Jeff Waugh wrote:
We'd like the officers of the GNOME Foundation to reflect the current state
and practice of the Board, and recommend this as best practice for future
Boards, so here is what we're going to do:
1. Request a letter of resignation from Miguel (as that is the only way
Hello,
Could somebody point me to the p.g.o. policy, please?
For about 8 months I'm asking to add my blog to p.g.o. with no response.
I would like to know in which part my blog, me and/or
http://gnome.org.ru do not satisfy with any published policy.
--
Thanks you in advance,
Valek
quote who=Dave Neary
I think there's value in having a figurehead president divorced from the
day-to-day running of things
Unfortunately, that is not how the position is defined in the bylaws. Over
the past few years, what we have called the Chairman (for touchy-feely
reaosns) has for all
2007/8/7, Dave Neary [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
Jeff Waugh wrote:
So here's the proposal: I'd like to suggest we shift the election cycle back
six months, landing the process in May and June [1]. More controversially, I
reckon the best way to achieve this without a lot of pain would be to
