quote who=jamie
I can see MS spinning this to their advantage and I believe playing safe
here would be better for us in the short term
Thing is, Microsoft haven't spun it to their advantage. They've mentioned
that Gnumeric is implementing OOXML, but that actually works against them
(due to the
On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 03:16:48AM +1100, Jeff Waugh wrote:
quote who=jamie
I can see MS spinning this to their advantage and I believe playing safe
here would be better for us in the short term
Thing is, Microsoft haven't spun it to their advantage. They've mentioned
that Gnumeric is
On Sun, 2007-11-25 at 12:18 -0500, Jody Goldberg wrote:
On Sun, Nov 25, 2007 at 12:56:09PM +, jamie wrote:
MOOX is most likely to become irrelevant IMO
Not agreed.
its debatable and subjective - yes. I reject the notion its a foregone
conclusion that MS gets its way however
quote who=jamie
In any event I dont understand why the gnome foundation was pulled into
this - cant you do your work with ECMA without foundation backing?
As explained in the statement, the GNOME Foundation joined ECMA as a
non-profit to allow Jody to continue his work sucking the
On Mon, 2007-11-26 at 04:45 +1100, Jeff Waugh wrote:
quote who=jamie
In any event I dont understand why the gnome foundation was pulled into
this - cant you do your work with ECMA without foundation backing?
As explained in the statement, the GNOME Foundation joined ECMA as a
non-profit
quote who=jamie
On Mon, 2007-11-26 at 04:45 +1100, Jeff Waugh wrote:
quote who=jamie
In any event I dont understand why the gnome foundation was pulled
into this - cant you do your work with ECMA without foundation
backing?
As explained in the statement, the GNOME Foundation
