Hi!
First of all, thanks a millions to Behdad and Elijah for taking up
this task and congrats for managing to accomplish it so effectively.
On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 4:10 PM, Jason D. Clinton m...@jasonclinton.com wrote:
On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 2:43 AM, Karl Lattimer k...@qdh.org.uk wrote:
I'd
On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 8:51 AM, Olav Vitters o...@bkor.dhs.org wrote:
That isn't a contest. It is a survey.
Please don't read more in to my email than I intended. There's no need
to get defensive.
http://www.gnome.org/~shaunm/survey/first-picks-permutations.png It
seems to me that a lot of
On Sun, Jan 04, 2009 at 09:40:33AM -0600, Jason D. Clinton wrote:
On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 8:51 AM, Olav Vitters o...@bkor.dhs.org wrote:
That isn't a contest. It is a survey.
Please don't read more in to my email than I intended. There's no need
to get defensive.
It is not defensive. I
On Sun, Jan 04, 2009 at 08:10:21AM -0600, Jason D. Clinton wrote:
This is pretty decent analysis going on here :)
I'd like to remind people of John Carr's recent blog post too, someone
mentioned in the survey results actually. JC has been working on bzr with
git protocol support, which
On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 11:48 AM, John Carr john.c...@unrouted.co.uk wrote:
I'm not a complete idiot - if it was going to be a degraded,
bastardized form of Git I wouldn't waste my time on it. I suppose I
might be an evil genius stalling for Bazaar DS9 to be written (sorry
for the very bad joke
Elijah Newren did an initial analysis of the data. His analysis also includes
the survey questions and answers. Find it at:
http://blogs.gnome.org/newren/2009/01/03/gnome-dvcs-survey-results/
This is pretty decent analysis going on here :)
I'd like to remind people of John Carr's
2009-01-04 klockan 15:10 skrev Jason D. Clinton:
I'd like to point out that--of the 15 people who regularly use git and
bzr--git still won.
Two remarks.
First remark: In the survey I answered that I do not really know much about
git, and that I do not use it often. This has a reason, which I
On Sun, 2009-01-04 at 17:48 +, John Carr wrote:
As bkor has stated, there are lots of Git users so any implementation
will support you, and support you well. That is a requirement. So any
talk of my idea is not Git vs Bazaar, its talk of one way we can move
forward. So i dont consider it
On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 3:01 PM, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) zee...@gmail.com wrote:
How about we set-up a task-force of volunteers who would want to
help in the move, each volunteer promising at least 3 hours a week? 3
hours is a very small amount of time but I am hoping that we'll be
able to
On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 3:59 PM, David Zeuthen da...@fubar.dk wrote:
On Sun, 2009-01-04 at 17:48 +, John Carr wrote:
As bkor has stated, there are lots of Git users so any implementation
will support you, and support you well. That is a requirement. So any
talk of my idea is not Git vs
Hi!
On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 6:06 PM, Olav Vitters o...@bkor.dhs.org wrote:
On Sun, Jan 04, 2009 at 09:40:33AM -0600, Jason D. Clinton wrote:
On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 8:51 AM, Olav Vitters o...@bkor.dhs.org wrote:
Moving will not be easy, obviously. But doing it John's way will be,
in my
On Sun, 2009-01-04 at 23:01 +0200, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote:
How about we set-up a task-force of volunteers who would want to
help in the move, each volunteer promising at least 3 hours a week? 3
hours is a very small amount of time but I am hoping that we'll be
able to gather at least 10
On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 3:47 PM, Luca Ferretti elle@libero.it wrote:
bzr allows lightweight checkouts [1]. What about git?
Yes, it does. This is not an issue.
___
foundation-list mailing list
foundation-list@gnome.org
On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 11:47 PM, Luca Ferretti elle@libero.it wrote:
Il giorno dom, 04/01/2009 alle 16.11 -0500, Matthias Clasen ha scritto:
It seems pretty clear to me that any 'homegrown' system like this is
not suitable as a longterm, stable solution for a project the size of
gnome.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Matthias Clasen schrieb:
On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 3:59 PM, David Zeuthen da...@fubar.dk wrote:
On Sun, 2009-01-04 at 17:48 +, John Carr wrote:
As bkor has stated, there are lots of Git users so any implementation
will support you, and support
On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 11:05 PM, David Zeuthen da...@fubar.dk wrote:
On Sun, 2009-01-04 at 22:47 +0100, Frederic Peters wrote:
Probably just like bzr already went through several repository formats
and allowed easy upgrades (just like Subversion repository format
changed and it didn't
On Sun, 2009-01-04 at 23:20 +0100, Ali Sabil wrote:
First, it only makes it much harder for users to grasp; we're
going to
end up with some projects have l.g.o pages / README files /
mailing list
messages saying use bzr to check out this branch and
On Sun, Jan 04, 2009 at 05:29:02PM -0500, David Zeuthen wrote:
Uh, but that's exactly how I understood the proposal and I believe that
the points I made (that you didn't respond to) still stands: That it's
crazy to officially want to support git, bzr and hg *at* the same time
*from* the same
On Sun, Jan 04, 2009 at 11:37:05PM +0100, Patryk Zawadzki wrote:
On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 11:33 PM, Olav Vitters o...@bkor.dhs.org wrote:
On Sun, Jan 04, 2009 at 05:29:02PM -0500, David Zeuthen wrote:
Uh, but that's exactly how I understood the proposal and I believe that
the points I made
On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 11:33 PM, Olav Vitters o...@bkor.dhs.org wrote:
On Sun, Jan 04, 2009 at 05:29:02PM -0500, David Zeuthen wrote:
Uh, but that's exactly how I understood the proposal and I believe that
the points I made (that you didn't respond to) still stands: That it's
crazy to
On Sun, 2009-01-04 at 23:01 +0200, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote:
To be honest,
I really wonder if something else would happen that I'd qualify as a
good switch.
How about we set-up a task-force of volunteers who would want to
help in the move, each volunteer promising at least 3 hours
Hi!
It seems pretty clear to me that any 'homegrown' system like this is
not suitable as a longterm, stable solution for a project the size of
gnome.
I totally agree here! This is simply a problem of QA. If someone writes
a system that can serve all possible (D)VCS clients that's fine but
On Sun, 2009-01-04 at 23:58 +0100, Olav Vitters wrote:
On Sun, Jan 04, 2009 at 05:40:18PM -0500, David Zeuthen wrote:
Is it *really* so hard to understand that this whole git-serve is a
terrible idea?
You expect me to reply to this??!?
I expected you to reply to the other three mails
On Mon, Jan 05, 2009 at 12:04:30AM +0100, Johannes Schmid wrote:
Hi!
It seems pretty clear to me that any 'homegrown' system like this is
not suitable as a longterm, stable solution for a project the size of
gnome.
I totally agree here! This is simply a problem of QA. If someone writes
On Sun, Jan 04, 2009 at 06:05:30PM -0500, David Zeuthen wrote:
On Sun, 2009-01-04 at 23:58 +0100, Olav Vitters wrote:
On Sun, Jan 04, 2009 at 05:40:18PM -0500, David Zeuthen wrote:
Is it *really* so hard to understand that this whole git-serve is a
terrible idea?
You expect me to
On Mon, 2009-01-05 at 00:18 +0100, Olav Vitters wrote:
I am not evading. Stop trying to make this personal. I don't care about
CoC, I don't like you're talking to me.
Please. Stop trying to make this look like it's personal and like I'm
assaulting you. Because I didn't. And I resent the
26 matches
Mail list logo
