Re: GNOME DVCS Survey Results

On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 5:22 PM, Olav Vitters wrote: > On Sun, Jan 04, 2009 at 06:34:47PM -0500, David Zeuthen wrote: >> On Mon, 2009-01-05 at 00:18 +0100, Olav Vitters wrote: >> > I am not evading. Stop trying to make this personal. I don't care about >> > CoC, I don't like you're talking to me. >

Re: GNOME DVCS Survey Results

On ma, 2009-01-05 at 12:32 -0500, Diego Escalante Urrelo wrote: > On 1/5/09, Johannes Schmid wrote: > > > > 6. Check all the documentation stuff on live.gnome.org that needs to be > > updated. That is really important because not everybody is familiar with > > git. There should also be a short i

Re: GNOME DVCS Survey Results

On 1/5/09, Johannes Schmid wrote: > > 6. Check all the documentation stuff on live.gnome.org that needs to be > updated. That is really important because not everybody is familiar with > git. There should also be a short introduction to git somewhere on the > wiki. And some announcements should

Re: GNOME DVCS Survey Results

On Sun, Jan 04, 2009 at 06:34:47PM -0500, David Zeuthen wrote: > On Mon, 2009-01-05 at 00:18 +0100, Olav Vitters wrote: > > I am not evading. Stop trying to make this personal. I don't care about > > CoC, I don't like you're talking to me. > > Please. Stop trying to make this look like it's person

Re: GNOME DVCS Survey Results

Hi! Am Montag, den 05.01.2009, 16:23 +0100 schrieb Mathias Hasselmann: > First of all I want to thank Behdad and the participants of the survey > for giving us numbers. > > Second I want to complain about the direction this discussion takes. > No idea why that many people become personal. This is

Re: GNOME DVCS Survey Results

First of all I want to thank Behdad and the participants of the survey for giving us numbers. Second I want to complain about the direction this discussion takes. No idea why that many people become personal. This is really unpleasant. Third of all: What so complicated about this migration? As fa

Re: GNOME DVCS Survey Results

On Mon, Jan 05, 2009 at 07:00:52AM -0700, Elijah Newren wrote: > I'd like to help with another path forward, namely native git > repositories since I believe that is what most of the community wants. > As you said, it isn't clear how it could work for non-sysadmins to > come up with clear proposal

Re: GNOME DVCS Survey Results

On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 1:18 PM, Felipe Contreras wrote: > 2009/1/5 Ali Sabil : > > > > > > On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 11:33 PM, Olav Vitters wrote: > >> > >> On Sun, Jan 04, 2009 at 05:29:02PM -0500, David Zeuthen wrote: > >> > Uh, but that's exactly how I understood the proposal and I believe > tha

Re: GNOME DVCS Survey Results

2009/1/5 Ali Sabil : > > > On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 11:33 PM, Olav Vitters wrote: >> >> On Sun, Jan 04, 2009 at 05:29:02PM -0500, David Zeuthen wrote: >> > Uh, but that's exactly how I understood the proposal and I believe that >> > the points I made (that you didn't respond to) still stands: That i

Re: GNOME DVCS Survey Results

Jason D. Clinton wrote: > On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 8:51 AM, Olav Vitters wrote: >> That isn't a contest. It is a survey. > > Please don't read more in to my email than I intended. There's no need > to get defensive. > > >>> It >>>

Re: GNOME DVCS Survey Results

On Sun, 2009-01-04 at 23:16 +0100, Robin Sonefors wrote: > > How much does it consume if it's a svn checkout? I heard (don't > know > > if it's true or not) git repo usually takes less diskspace then svn > > checkout. This page seems to support this claim: > > A complete git repo is usually smal

Re: GNOME DVCS Survey Results

On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 11:33 PM, Olav Vitters wrote: > On Sun, Jan 04, 2009 at 05:29:02PM -0500, David Zeuthen wrote: >> Uh, but that's exactly how I understood the proposal and I believe that >> the points I made (that you didn't respond to) still stands: That it's >> crazy to officially want to

Re: GNOME DVCS Survey Results

On sön, 2009-01-04 at 23:58 +0200, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote: > On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 11:47 PM, Luca Ferretti wrote: > > Il giorno dom, 04/01/2009 alle 16.11 -0500, Matthias Clasen ha scritto: > > > >> It seems pretty clear to me that any 'homegrown' system like this is > >> not suitable as a l

Re: GNOME DVCS Survey Results

Il giorno dom, 04/01/2009 alle 23.58 +0200, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) ha scritto: > On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 11:47 PM, Luca Ferretti wrote: > > Il giorno dom, 04/01/2009 alle 16.11 -0500, Matthias Clasen ha scritto: > > > >> It seems pretty clear to me that any 'homegrown' system like this is > >> not s

Re: GNOME DVCS Survey Results

On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 10:47 PM, Luca Ferretti wrote: > People using JHBuild to develop one project against latest code or > simply testing the whole desktop don't need the full history for all > GNOME Desktop modules > > bzr allows lightweight checkouts [1]. What about git? git-clone has a --dep

Re: GNOME DVCS Survey Results

Il giorno dom, 04/01/2009 alle 16.11 -0500, Matthias Clasen ha scritto: > It seems pretty clear to me that any 'homegrown' system like this is > not suitable as a longterm, stable solution for a project the size of > gnome. BTW, once switched to DVCS, how much disk space I should have in order to

Re: GNOME DVCS Survey Results

Hi, On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 7:51 AM, Olav Vitters wrote: > Anyway, I'd rather add John Carr to the sysadmin team. I plan to make a > proposal to switch GNOME to a DVCS where Git works using Johns > suggestion. Then other sysadmins[1] can suggest whatever proposal they > want. These proposals can b

Re: GNOME DVCS Survey Results

Ali Sabil a écrit : That's not what John's proposal is about ! John wants to use the bzr format as a repository format, and add a git-serve plugin to bzr to be able to "talk" to the git clients. In other words, you will be able to access the same data using either bzr, git or hg. Well, if peopl