Define Many ? I personally support FSF's ethics in principle, please
don't speak for all of us.
I think it's somewhat split, but sort of having everyone in the foundation
state their stance on it, I don't know how 'many' could be defined.
There are people who are in a position to state
On Jan 10, 2015, at 6:35 AM, Magdalen Berns m.be...@thismagpie.com wrote:
Perhaps some might be seeing Richard as the FSF too quickly and not giving
due regard what he is actually saying about this in the reactions to what
he's putting forward. How he's defined dodgy links really does not
On Jan 6, 2015, at 2:54 PM, Magdalen Berns m.be...@thismagpie.com wrote:
The stigma related to bitcoin is just the media doing their thing to try and
discredit it, in my humble view. A lot of people do not buy into that stuff.
With that said, it is reasonable for anyone to be uncomfortable
On Jan 9, 2015, at 8:33 PM, Mathieu Duponchelle mduponchel...@gmail.com wrote:
Define Many ? I personally support FSF's ethics in principle, please don't
speak for all of us.
However you define “many”, it doesn’t mean “all”, Mathieu, so don’t speak for —
or over — those of us who aren’t in
Generally I think that the people who are not on board understand what is
being discussed and simply disagree with certain aspects of it. I know that
is the case with me. I contribute to FOSS, etc, but I do not always share
the same ethics as the FSF. My impression is that that is common. We
It’s frankly pretty difficult for me at least to distinguish between
Richard-speaking-as-Richard-alone and Richard-speaking-as-the-FSF, and he
never makes the distinction himself. Does he hold some viewpoint that the
FSF does not, or vice versa? That would actually be news to me.
Define Many ? I personally support FSF's ethics in principle, please
don't speak for all of us.
I think it's somewhat split, but sort of having everyone in the foundation
state their stance on it, I don't know how 'many' could be defined.
The elected members of the Board of Directors
On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 8:35 AM, Magdalen Berns m.be...@thismagpie.com
wrote:
Perhaps some might be seeing Richard as the FSF too quickly and not
giving due regard what he is actually saying about this in the reactions to
what he's putting forward. How he's defined dodgy links really does not
