You're right John, and some others have pointed out, that we should act by
offer blogs, news and any other difussion we have access too, to promote
GNOME, GTK+ apps and all its goodness; this is the right way.
I love, to see more actions from GNOME Foundation to support, by
contracting people maki
I was involved somewhat with the discussions Daniel keeps referring to. The
talk of lack of GNOME applications referred to applications targeting the
gnome HIG. Nothing to do with being open or not.
Part of wanting to create something like this week in GNOME is to help draw
attention to efforts ma
> > * No apps for GNOME/GTK+
>
> If that means that we don't offer a place to download nonfree
> applications, that's not a flaw, that's a moral superiority!
> It's part of respecting users' freedom.
I think "App" in this context means what flatpack (and all its
spiritual predecessors) is curr
> * No apps for GNOME/GTK+
If that means that we don't offer a place to download nonfree
applications, that's not a flaw, that's a moral superiority!
It's part of respecting users' freedom.
Every GNU/Linux distro offers a system for installing packages. And,
of course, you can install programs
