Hey, you did not react to Nicolas Dufresne's suggestion of using webrtc ?
Services like appear.in do not require installing extra software, as most
of the heavy lifting is already done by modern browsers ( I'm sure someone
will implement support in emacs at some point :) ).
On Sat, Jan 9, 2016 at
I feel like everything about this has been stated twice, can we please stop
with that thread?
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 6:05 PM, Magdalen Berns m.be...@thismagpie.com
wrote:
[...]
It seems proportionate to try to seek compelling evidence to
support the
hypothesis that this is a
Define Many ? I personally support FSF's ethics in principle, please
don't speak for all of us.
On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 2:58 AM, Nimit Shah nimit.sv...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Magdalen,
I agree with Meg. Many of us don't share the same ethics as FSF and that
is the reason why we don't have much
aspects of the OPW program.
On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 5:18 PM, meg ford meg...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 8:54 AM, Mathieu Duponchelle
mduponchel...@gmail.com wrote:
It seems I'm far from being the only one to think OPW should be
abstracted away from GNOME. The subject of this thread
wrote:
Hi Germán ,
I apologize for the bad paste. I was replying to Mathieu Duponchelle but
the paste was from an email in which you quoted his previous email.
Cheers,
Meg
On Sun, Apr 13, 2014 at 7:52 PM, Germán Poo-Caamaño g...@gnome.orgwrote:
On Fri, 2014-04-11 at 19:44 -0500, meg ford
I'll play devil's advocate here:
Couldn't GNOME use funds from these various sponsors to fund activities
more directly beneficial to its future than OPW?
I'll leave the question of what these other activities might be to the
engagement core team, who discuss that at length and will certainly
a particular interest in outreach to women).
Cheers
On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 2:36 AM, Germán Poo-Caamaño g...@gnome.org wrote:
On Sat, 2014-04-12 at 01:45 +0200, Mathieu Duponchelle wrote:
I'll play devil's advocate here:
Couldn't GNOME use funds from these various sponsors to fund
I'm not sure this is a direct answer to the question I was asking,
but yes it is clear that finding more funding would be beneficial in the
absolute,
I have absolutely no clue regarding that though :)
On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 2:44 AM, meg ford meg...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at
Good to see you react so fast, thanks for the work!
On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 12:06 AM, Andrea Veri a...@gnome.org wrote:
On Wed, 09 Apr 2014, Andrea Veri wrote:
Have an awesome day everyone and please mail support AT gnome DOT
org in case of problems.
Issues like (Error code:
That logic, if followed to its end, means Fedora is giving no credit to GNU
or Linux. If a high-level application needed to cite all its components in
its name, that could be inconvenient.
I wouldn't call ArchLinux's name an error personally but hey :)
On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 10:02 PM, Richard
Hi Karen,
Joining my thanks too, I have been lucky enough to work with you these past
few months and you've always been incredibly available and helpful.
Best of luck for your new adventures !
Mathieu
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 6:13 PM, Emmanuele Bassi eba...@gmail.com wrote:
hi Karen;
I'd
Hello,
Hi,
Le vendredi 13 décembre 2013, à 19:37 +0100, Mathieu Duponchelle a écrit :
Hi everyone !
Following a discussion with Karen Sandler and other members of the
gnome engagement team in the #engagement channel on gimpnet,
it was decided that a mail to that list would be necessary
Hi everyone !
Following a discussion with Karen Sandler and other members of the
gnome engagement team in the #engagement channel on gimpnet,
it was decided that a mail to that list would be necessary, to
expose the legal and technical aspects of the crowdfunding campaign
we are about to start
13 matches
Mail list logo
