On Sun, Jun 03, 2018 at 02:15:35PM +0100, Karen Sandler wrote:
>
> > * Sriram Ramkrishna for his community work, which is a list too long to
> > summarize here
>
> +1, and just to be effusive about why... Sri has continually contributed to
> GNOME's PR, bringing life to the engagement team and
On Wed, Dec 07, 2016 at 06:47:46PM +0100, Alexandre Franke wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 8:35 PM, Josh Triplett <j...@joshtriplett.org> wrote:
> > Unless the individual contributors working on the site have actually
> > legally assigned copyright to the GNOME Foundatio
s like gnome.org ought to have such a list somewhere.
- Josh Triplett
___
foundation-list mailing list
foundation-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list
On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 10:28:04AM -0400, Dave Neary wrote:
> On 05/16/2016 09:41 AM, Daniel Espinosa wrote:
> > How to avoid any organization or individual, could use GNOME trademark
> > to promote against GNOME?
>
> You cannot use trademark to stop someone from calling a thing by its
>
for other
purposes (such as the same purpose as debian.net or github.io, namely a
home for developer subdomains for projects).
I think it'd be entirely appropriate for the GNOME Foundation to receive
this. Someone from the Board (BCCed) would be the most appropriate
person to either broker that or
lf does not hold copyrights. Is anyone
> aware of any other free software organization that might be willing and able
> to receive our copyrights? Thanks -
You might consider the Free Software Foundation (FSF), Software in the Public
Interest (SPI),
will instead
get a link to f-droid.
Doing so seems quite similar to making an application available for
Windows: we don't encourage people to run Windows, but we sometimes make
Free Software available for Windows for users who already do run it.
- Josh Triplett
_
On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 10:03:33PM -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
On Sat, 2015-07-18 at 12:33 -0400, Jeff Fortin Tam wrote:
* Is not a board member (since the board decides who the winner is).
Quick question: does this rule exclude current board members, incoming
board members, or both?
seek such support or that we'd
offer it), and more concerned about whether they're actually acting in
good faith or whether they might be doing something that will actively
damage the reputations of Linux, GNU, GNOME, and other Free Software
projects.
- Josh Triplett
Software, if you feel that
that would more fully acknowledge Free Software.
- Josh Triplett
___
foundation-list mailing list
foundation-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list
hosting point for a repository. To that
end, I have a first draft of Responsible Distribution of Free and Open
Source Software, which I'd love to get feedback on. I'll send that
draft privately as well. (I intend to distribute it for *public*
feedback in the very near future, as well.)
- Josh
on a historical basis.
I've CCed Paul Tagliamonte of the Sunlight Foundation (also of OSI and
Debian), who might be able to help here.
- Josh Triplett
___
foundation-list mailing list
foundation-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo
as well, and I'm
curious how that happened.
I would also suggest that this should be the top priority issue for the
GNOME Foundation to fix. Is the current Board already working to fix
this?
- Josh Triplett
___
foundation-list mailing list
foundation
with
installers for Free Software, including GNOME projects like the GIMP.
I'm currently thinking of writing up a Hosting Free Software
Responsibly statement for projects, organizations (FSF, GNOME, etc),
and hosting sites to sign on to.
- Josh Triplett
Software.
- Josh Triplett
___
foundation-list mailing list
foundation-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list
GNOME projects due to problems like those.
- Josh Triplett
___
foundation-list mailing list
foundation-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list
of native applications, and a novel new UI.
These are points that would help GNOME do better at what it does today,
and take better care of the users it has.
- Josh Triplett
___
foundation-list mailing list
foundation-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 05:05:30PM +0200, Alexandre Franke wrote:
On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 7:42 PM, Josh Triplett j...@joshtriplett.org wrote:
Nobody is asking anyone to sign anything. A CoC would simply be a
stated policy for expected behavior on community resources, such as
mailing lists
, that should wait until we have the new board.
- Josh Triplett
___
foundation-list mailing list
foundation-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list
transparency would have been
helpful, as an example of what to improve?
I certainly plan to be entirely transparent about my *own* activities if
elected to the board.
- Josh Triplett
___
foundation-list mailing list
foundation-list@gnome.org
https
On Sun, May 24, 2015 at 07:11:42PM +0200, Olav Vitters wrote:
On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 10:06:49AM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
I'm entirely in favor of an improved code of conduct, both for events
and in general. And thank you for raising this issue.
Some searching turned up https
.
- Josh Triplett
___
foundation-list mailing list
foundation-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list
that I would not want to see GNOME
become; there are too many of those already, because there are too many
projects unwilling to kick out awful people.
See also
http://www.slideshare.net/dberkholz/assholes-are-killing-your-project
- Josh Triplett
, and members of the Foundation and the Board.
- Josh Triplett
___
foundation-list mailing list
foundation-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 05:25:51PM -0400, Karen Sandler wrote:
I have a few questions for the candidates too. I agree with what has
been said by Jeff and Josh that it's important that people on the
board have a diverse skillset, so I wouldn't expect all board
members to answer yes
and GNOME technologies, and building a
support base there. That's in addition to existing efforts to establish
events and volunteer contributors.
- Josh Triplett
___
foundation-list mailing list
foundation-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo
. Someone needs to
seek out quest information to solve ancient challenges, talk nobles and
businessfolk into offering high rewards, rally others to the cause, or
offer off-the-wall ideas and encouragement. :)
- Josh Triplett
___
foundation-list mailing list
Name: Josh Triplett
Email: j...@joshtriplett.org or jtripl...@gnome.org
Affiliation: Intel, but not speaking for Intel or wearing my Intel hat
except when explicitly stated as such.
I've been a Free Software developer for 15 years, and a GNOME user since
the early 1.x days, running
to Peter from my side, because you made me
think about it more carefully!
Regards,
Josh
___
foundation-list mailing list
foundation-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list
Hi
On Wed, 2006-20-12 at 14:44 +0100, Dave Neary wrote:
Josh Kress wrote:
Thanks for the replies so far.
[No replies from the board directly, but this might be due to bad timing
on my side]
Let me be the first.
I didn't feel the need to reply, because Peter's reply so well summed
and the
hardware for the event box is already a deal. I now try to get Novell,
Red Hat, Sun etc. to provide some funds as well (The plan is to plaster
up the box with the logos of the sponsors).
I'll keep you posted!
Regards,
Josh
PS: Do we have an official contact with Intel? Maybe they will provide
31 matches
Mail list logo
