Jeff,
On 11/16/05, Jeff Waugh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
something so fundamental to the process: Yes, people do run for election so
that those they do not trust are not elected. Surprise? Not even remotely.
By itself, this is unsurprising. But coupled with:
1) The small number of people who
On Wed, 2005-11-16 at 09:46 +0100, Quim Gil wrote:
I also would assume that announcement is valid enough. We haven't got
that many candidates and I guess the Foundation can be flexible enouh to
accept this candidacy.
This is a problem which has to be solved by the election committee.
I
If the announce was not clear or if the informations can not be easily
found, please send a mail to the committee so it can be improved next
year.
An improvement would be to include some comments on the campaign. I
don't know if it should be about rules or netiquette. For instance:
-
Anne Østergaard wrote:
I remember that Miguel de Icaza one year was announcing his candidacy a
little after the time limit and his candidacy was not accepted by the
committee. He also was on travel and was a very serious candidate for
the board.
With the difference that he had not expressed
On Wed, November 16, 2005 10:33, Quim Gil wrote:
If the announce was not clear or if the informations can not be easily
found, please send a mail to the committee so it can be improved next
year.
An improvement would be to include some comments on the campaign. I
don't know if it should be
On Wed, 2005-11-16 at 11:28 +0100, Vincent Untz wrote:
On Wed, November 16, 2005 10:33, Quim Gil wrote:
If the announce was not clear or if the informations can not be easily
found, please send a mail to the committee so it can be improved next
year.
An improvement would be to include
But I would like to say this sooner and not later that I think that you
as a candidate yourself should not at the same time be sitting on the
election committee- for your own sake as a serious and very skilled
candidate to a seat on the board.
I didn't comment anything about Vincent's
As a member of membership committee I can honestly say that Vincent's
instant leaving membership committee would end up problems with
elections as well. That must be the real reason that kept him in
committee still.
Even though we have experienced some as members in past, other members
of
On Wed, 2005-16-11 at 13:14 +0100, Dave Neary wrote:
Quim Gil wrote:
Gosh, we are not the EU Parliament or the US Congress. Neither have we
28 candidates to choose from. If we keep kicking off candidates for
procedural reasons we will end up not needing to vote at all.
Hear, hear. A
On 11/16/05, Andreas J. Guelzow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2005-16-11 at 13:14 +0100, Dave Neary wrote:
Quim Gil wrote:
Gosh, we are not the EU Parliament or the US Congress. Neither have we
28 candidates to choose from. If we keep kicking off candidates for
procedural reasons
On Wed, 2005-11-16 at 08:39 +0100, Anne Østergaard wrote:
Could we please have a full list of all the candidates who actually
announced there candidacies for the GNOME Board of Directors within the
time limit?
Hi Anne (and others),
For a number of reasons (totally unrelated to Jeff), the
11 matches
Mail list logo
