Andy:
On 05/26/11 04:51, Andy Wingo wrote:
You just used the name Richard Stallman as a token for this argument
is invalid.
You then proceeded to call someone stalinist; was it Richard? Was it
GNOME OS proponents? Unclear.
This was a poor attempt at humor, I guess. With my words I was
Hello all,
GNOME OS has been mentioned and questioned repeatedly in recent
discussions on desktop-devel-list, about its definition itself[1],
and the changing (or not?) role of the GNOME project with regards
to distributions (based or not on the Linux kernel).
What are your thougths on this?[2]
On Wed, 2011-05-25 at 08:24 +0200, Frederic Peters wrote:
Hello all,
GNOME OS has been mentioned and questioned repeatedly in recent
discussions on desktop-devel-list, about its definition itself[1],
and the changing (or not?) role of the GNOME project with regards
to distributions (based
On Wed, 2011-05-25 at 08:24 +0200, Frederic Peters wrote:
Hello all,
GNOME OS has been mentioned and questioned repeatedly in recent
discussions on desktop-devel-list, about its definition itself[1],
and the changing (or not?) role of the GNOME project with regards
to distributions (based
Le mercredi 25 mai 2011 à 08:24 +0200, Frederic Peters a écrit :
Hello all,
GNOME OS has been mentioned and questioned repeatedly in recent
discussions on desktop-devel-list, about its definition itself[1],
and the changing (or not?) role of the GNOME project with regards
to distributions
2011/5/25 Frederic Peters fpet...@gnome.org:
What are your thougths on this?[2] Do you think this is a foundation
job to answer those questions? If not, is this a responsibility of the
release team? Or something that is best left unanswered, as pieces are
put into positions by different
Hello Frederic :)
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 1:24 AM, Frederic Peters fpet...@gnome.org wrote:
Hello all,
GNOME OS has been mentioned and questioned repeatedly in recent
discussions on desktop-devel-list, about its definition itself[1],
and the changing (or not?) role of the GNOME project with
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 12:24 AM, Frederic Peters fpet...@gnome.org wrote:
Hello all,
GNOME OS has been mentioned and questioned repeatedly in recent
discussions on desktop-devel-list, about its definition itself[1],
and the changing (or not?) role of the GNOME project with regards
to
On Wed, 2011-05-25 at 08:24 +0200, Frederic Peters wrote:
GNOME OS has been mentioned and questioned repeatedly in recent
discussions on desktop-devel-list, about its definition itself[1],
and the changing (or not?) role of the GNOME project with regards
to distributions (based or not on the
I really think the GNOME OS idea is a very good one, that is, making
GNOME provide access to configuration and features of the underlying OS,
so that it is a complete desktop that can deal with everything the users
would ever need from a desktop.
The idea is fine, but calling it
On 05/25/2011 02:24 PM, Frederic Peters wrote:
Hello all,
GNOME OS has been mentioned and questioned repeatedly in recent
discussions on desktop-devel-list, about its definition itself[1],
and the changing (or not?) role of the GNOME project with regards
to distributions (based or not on the
11 matches
Mail list logo
