6 mar 2007 kl. 22.04 skrev Hubert Figuiere:
Hi,
Esben Stien wrote:
I fear we are not setting correct guidelines for GNOME applications.
It would be very nice with a policy of separating the core and UI
throughout GNOME. This does not only mean applications using
libraries; this means using
I fear we are not setting correct guidelines for GNOME applications.
It would be very nice with a policy of separating the core and UI
throughout GNOME. This does not only mean applications using
libraries; this means using daemons as the core of every application.
This is proper engineering and
Op dinsdag 06-03-2007 om 14:01 uur [tijdzone +0100], schreef Esben
Stien:
I fear we are not setting correct guidelines for GNOME applications.
It would be very nice with a policy of separating the core and UI
throughout GNOME. This does not only mean applications using
libraries; this means
Op dinsdag 06-03-2007 om 14:01 uur [tijdzone +0100], schreef Esben
Stien:
An example is epiphany; by having a browser client core, you can
connect many different interfaces to the core and browse the same open
URLs'. Manipulating the data from a terminal is also a breeze.
Thanks for the
Reinout van Schouwen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Thanks for the compliment, on behalf of the Epiphany team. :)
I'm not sure we understand eachother;). Epiphany does not have this
architecture today. I once brought this up on the epiphany mailing
list and it was received well, though;).
Esben Stien wrote:
I fear we are not setting correct guidelines for GNOME applications.
It would be very nice with a policy of separating the core and UI
throughout GNOME. This does not only mean applications using
libraries; this means using daemons as the core of every application.
This
