El jue, 22-03-2007 a las 12:11 +, Alan Cox escribió:
Mexico has some claim to be the original home of Gnome...
In fact! we want to organize the GUADLAC (GNOME Users And Developers
Latin American Conference) the Latin American GUADEC, later this year,
it can be the pre-GUADEC in Mexico :)
On Fri, 2007-03-23 at 00:01 -0600, Miguel Angel López Hernández wrote:
El jue, 22-03-2007 a las 12:11 +, Alan Cox escribió:
Mexico has some claim to be the original home of Gnome...
In fact! we want to organize the GUADLAC (GNOME Users And Developers
Latin American Conference) the
quote who=Behdad Esfahbod
Why not just GUADAC? You are suggesting that US and Canada should start
their own GUADNAC, are you?
You guys have the Summit!
- Jeff
--
Open CeBIT 2007: Sydney, Australia http://www.opencebit.com.au/
'Cause remember, smug is beautiful. -
On Fri, 2007-03-23 at 02:01 +1100, Jeff Waugh wrote:
Where necessary, and in this case I think it is, we should be very clear
about GNOME's geopolitical view of the world: North America is not in
Europe.
- Jeff
Hey Jeff,
GNOME cannot have a geopolitical view since Gnome is people and
On 3/23/07, Murray Cumming [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2007-03-23 at 15:14 +0200, Baris Cicek wrote:
I'll talk w/ our local GUG about if we can organize to host GUADEC next
year in Istanbul.
Please, yes.
Please, no. Not until I can come. Istanbul 2010! ;)
Luis (seriously, Istanbul
What about Malta? Cypress?
sri
On 3/22/07, Behdad Esfahbod [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 2007-03-22 at 10:37 +0100, Dave Neary wrote:
Does that mean that candidates outside the EU would be considered? Not
sure - we would need to discuss it.
But one thing is for sure - the travel costs
I'm only on foundation-announce, not on foundation-list, but yet I get
this discussion about GUADEC 2008. Can you please make the
announcement list moderated so all these follow-up postings don't get
distributed to everyone.
Thanks.
Example:
* Christian F.K. Schaller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 3/23/07, Baris Cicek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2007-03-23 at 11:29 +0100, Christian F.K. Schaller wrote:
I think we should in general encourage people who think they are located
in a place that make it feasible for people in west Europe and the US
to go there to apply to host
On Fri, 2007-03-23 at 07:04 -0700, Elliot Lee wrote:
Baris Cicek wrote:
I'll talk w/ our local GUG about if we can organize to host GUADEC next
year in Istanbul.
Not Constantinople?
It was called Constantinople ages ago, afaik, but however you call it,
as long as we point same land
On 3/24/07, Baris Cicek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2007-03-23 at 07:04 -0700, Elliot Lee wrote:
Baris Cicek wrote:
I'll talk w/ our local GUG about if we can organize to host GUADEC next
year in Istanbul.
Not Constantinople?
It was called Constantinople ages ago, afaik, but
On Thu, 2007-03-22 at 20:01 -0700, sri wrote:
What about Malta? Cypress?
While I don't know where all the membership lives, I do know that Sri is
hanging in Portland. Why are so many North Americans (No.mericans)
suggesting cities, and why have so many missed the entire European
peninsula? This
On 24 Mar 2007, at 14:56, Curtis Hovey wrote:
[...]
Reykjavik is the closest European city to North Americans. It has the
largest number of pubs/bars per capita. Lots of hot tubs. It produces
more than its fair share of musicians. Faries (magical folk) are
protected by law!
Brilliant idea! I
I think we should in general encourage people who think they are located
in a place that make it feasible for people in west Europe and the US
to go there to apply to host GUADEC. Even if they are not in Europe per
se. For instance I it struck me that Morocco could be a good alternative
when I
Well, I would love a GUADEC in Morocco, however, I doubt that we had
the necessary local group there for organizing it. :(
Salu2
On 3/23/07, Christian F.K. Schaller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think we should in general encourage people who think they are located
in a place that make it
But one thing is for sure - the travel costs for attendees is something
which will definitely be taken into account, and in general that will
exclude anything outside North America and Europe.
I think excluding NA would be reasonable as well - there are so many
OSS conferences on the other side
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dave Neary wrote:
But one thing is for sure - the travel costs for attendees is something
which will definitely be taken into account, and in general that will
exclude anything outside North America and Europe.
Or, in short unless a conference
Hi,
Sergey Udaltsov wrote:
I think excluding NA would be reasonable as well - there are so many
OSS conferences on the other side of the pond, please leave something
to good old Europe:)
To me the best free software conferences around aren't in the US -
FOSDEM, aKademy, LSM, GUADEC, OLS,
Perhaps the biggest free software business conferences are in the US
(your LinuxWorlds and OSCons of the world), but all the best community
conferences happen outside the US.
OK, then let's keep it this way:)
Sergey
___
foundation-list mailing list
But one thing is for sure - the travel costs for attendees is something
which will definitely be taken into account, and in general that will
exclude anything outside North America and Europe.
That depends upon the time of year and location. The bit of North
America which is civilised to
quote who=Luke Stroven
I'll footnotes it.
Hrm, except it's down right now. Boh!
Darn thunderstorms anyways.
Its back up ;)
Thanks Stro, unsung hero! (Rhymes for great justice!)
- Jeff
--
Open CeBIT 2007: Sydney, Australia http://www.opencebit.com.au/
And,
Alan Cox wrote:
But one thing is for sure - the travel costs for attendees is something
which will definitely be taken into account, and in general that will
exclude anything outside North America and Europe.
That depends upon the time of year and location. The bit of North
America which is
quote who=Hubert Figuiere
That said if there is any proposal for Canada (Montreal is IMHO a better
choice than Ottawa), count me in :-)
Where necessary, and in this case I think it is, we should be very clear
about GNOME's geopolitical view of the world: Quebecistan is not in Europe.
- Jeff
On Fri, 2007-03-23 at 01:35 +1100, Jeff Waugh wrote:
quote who=Hubert Figuiere
That said if there is any proposal for Canada (Montreal is IMHO a better
choice than Ottawa), count me in :-)
Where necessary, and in this case I think it is, we should be very clear
about GNOME's
On Thu, 2007-03-22 at 10:37 +0100, Dave Neary wrote:
Does that mean that candidates outside the EU would be considered? Not
sure - we would need to discuss it.
But one thing is for sure - the travel costs for attendees is
something
which will definitely be taken into account, and in
Call for invitations to be the host of GUADEC 2008
GUADEC is the yearly GNOME Users and Developers European Conference.
Dear GNOME friends
For those of you who would like to host the next GUADEC in 2008 you are
hereby invited to write a formal invitation to the board of The
GNOME Foundation.
quote who=Anne Østergaard
Call for invitations to be the host of GUADEC 2008
I'll footnotes it.
- Jeff
--
Open CeBIT 2007: Sydney, Australia http://www.opencebit.com.au/
GNOME. Vorsprung durch Einfachheit.
___
quote who=Jeff Waugh
quote who=Anne Østergaard
Call for invitations to be the host of GUADEC 2008
I'll footnotes it.
Hrm, except it's down right now. Boh!
- Jeff
--
Open CeBIT 2007: Sydney, Australia http://www.opencebit.com.au/
Instead you're doing circle jerks with
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Anne Østergaard wrote:
Call for invitations to be the host of GUADEC 2008
GUADEC is the yearly GNOME Users and Developers European Conference.
Does that automatically exclude those outside EU from sending proposals ?
:Sankarshan
- --
You see
28 matches
Mail list logo
