I must say, I hadn't read Joachim's other comments until
after I'd sent my endorsement. I stand by my assertion
that he's been a highly motivated contributor to the GDP,
although it's now somewhat hard to understand why.
It shouldn't be a surprise. People have lots of different
On Wed, 2006-11-29 at 11:27 -0500, Richard Stallman wrote:
I must say, I hadn't read Joachim's other comments until
after I'd sent my endorsement. I stand by my assertion
that he's been a highly motivated contributor to the GDP,
although it's now somewhat hard to understand
quote who=Shaun McCance
I also want to throw in a strong endorsement for Joachim.
I'm a little concerned -- based on Joachim's answers and commments on this
list -- that there would be some difficult philosophical gaps for the Board
to bridge (or worse, teach) should he be elected.
I don't
On 11/28/06, Jeff Waugh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
quote who=Shaun McCance
I also want to throw in a strong endorsement for Joachim.
I'm a little concerned -- based on Joachim's answers and commments on this
list -- that there would be some difficult philosophical gaps for the Board
to
quote who=Luis Villa
Perhaps Joachim could explain some of his comments. :-)
Perhaps you could explain which ones you mean, Jeff?
I thought it was pretty clear:
http://mail.gnome.org/archives/foundation-list/2006-November/msg00110.html
On Wed, 29 Nov 2006 12:01:08 +1100
Jeff Waugh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
quote who=Shaun McCance
I also want to throw in a strong endorsement for Joachim.
I'm a little concerned -- based on Joachim's answers and commments on this
list -- that there would be some difficult philosophical
However big and central the philosofical gap might be, I don't see it's
affecting Joachim's passionate contributions to GNOME in important aspects of
the project where others just don't go through. Besides, he is always open to
discussion, active search of agreement and acceptance of well
