Alan Horkan wrote:...
I would think a smaller board would require *more* delegation and given
the nature of the beast the idea of breaking down tasks into smaller parts
and trying to get other to help out more seems to makes a lot of sense.
It may 'require' it[1], but it does not ensure it.
(I didn't have time to read this thread before, sorry for coming a bit
late ;-))
On Mon, October 24, 2005 13:50, Luciana Bastos de Freitas Menezes wrote:
I live in the south of Brazil, and it seams contraditory while we're
raising the number of users, contributors, to decrease the number of our
Hi,
On Mon, October 24, 2005 21:09, Fernando San Martín Woerner wrote:
I agree with you, the referendum was created to decide if we want less
members, but may be there are some opinions to get more members on the
board, and that's not bad, because we can vote. On the other hand having
more
Hi Daniel,
On Tue, October 25, 2005 15:14, Daniel Veillard wrote:
On Mon, Oct 24, 2005 at 02:23:40PM -0600, Elijah Newren wrote:
On 10/24/05, Fernando San Martín Woerner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
With less members they will be forced to step down. That is my
intention. After each year I
On 10/26/05, Vincent Untz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I agree that they don't have enough chances because a lof of members
vote during elections as if it were a popularity contest. And they
probably do this because they don't see what actions the board is
doing or should do, and who would be good
On Tue, 2005-10-25 at 09:45 +0200, Murray Cumming wrote:
[...] many of us notice that the large
size of the group causes irrelevant distraction, even when urgent
decisions are necessary. That happens even with the best people.
I find it happens with teleconference consisting of only two or
El mar, 25-10-2005 a las 16:48 +0100, Bill Haneman escribió:
I agree with Liam. His observations
match my interpretation of my experiences on the Board.
In the Members meeting in stuttgart we've disscused this kind of topics,
i agree that board need leadership, and as Liam and Bill say
Actually, no you can't. Perhaps there are those who know how much
each board member has done but quite honestly, I have no clue. And
short of manually pinging all of them and trying to extract the
information from them not only about themselves but the others on the
board
On Tue, 2005-10-25 at 11:39 -0400, Liam R E Quin wrote:
I still think the problems being reported are nothing to do with
the size of the group but to do with lack of clear process and
with poor delegation. These are not easy to fix, but I don't
think changing the group size will help.
On
On Tue, 25 Oct 2005, Bill Haneman wrote:
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2005 16:48:22 +0100
From: Bill Haneman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Liam R E Quin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: foundation-list@gnome.org, Murray Cumming [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Vote NO on referendum to reduce board members
I agree
On จ., 2005-10-24 at 14:26 -0600, Elijah Newren wrote:
On 10/24/05, Elijah Newren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/24/05, Fernando San Martín Woerner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
El lun, 24-10-2005 a las 22:01 +0200, Olav Vitters escribió:
On Mon, Oct 24, 2005 at 09:22:17PM +0100, Alan Cox
11 matches
Mail list logo
