Hi,
On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 5:31 AM, Jonathon Jongsma
jonat...@quotidian.org wrote:
On Sun, 2010-02-28 at 03:11 +0100, Philip Van Hoof wrote:
On Sun, 2010-02-28 at 04:02 +0200, Zeeshan Ali wrote:
Hi everyone,
I don't think we need ethics-teachings about this. We GNOME
programmers
Hi,
On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 7:42 PM, Dodji Seketeli do...@seketeli.org wrote:
Le dim. 28 févr. 2010 à 19:20:39 (+0200), Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) a écrit:
Thanks for your clarification. Thing is that Philip had been using
the word 'we' quite a lot in the recent endless discussions as part of
Take this stuff off list please.
--
Regards,
Olav
___
foundation-list mailing list
foundation-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list
On Sun, 2010-02-28 at 04:02 +0200, Zeeshan Ali wrote:
Hi everyone,
I don't think we need ethics-teachings about this. We GNOME
programmers know. We do.
I can't say for others but I for one find it extremely insulting when
Mr. Van Hoof represent me without my concent. I really want to
On Sun, 2010-02-28 at 03:11 +0100, Philip Van Hoof wrote:
On Sun, 2010-02-28 at 04:02 +0200, Zeeshan Ali wrote:
Hi everyone,
I don't think we need ethics-teachings about this. We GNOME
programmers know. We do.
I can't say for others but I for one find it extremely insulting when
