On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 06:37:41PM -0500, Karen Sandler wrote:
Moreover, it's probably more polite to make requests about changes to
moderation policy off-list to the admins,
I'm set as one of the listadmins for this mailing list.
Suggest at minimum the following:
* decide what is on topic and
On Thu, 2013-01-10 at 07:42 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
Finally, I'd really like to know what contributions he made to GNOME
that would make him eligible to become a Foundation member. I cannot
find any.
I asked the very same question on #foundation IRC yesterday. One theory
that came up was
Is it standard procedure for credentials of Foundation members to be
discussed on-list like this -- particularly for existing members in good
standing?
For example, I don't recall my own membership being discussed herein when I
was renewed; it was done in private email with the Membership
Yes. This seems to have gone beyond the realm of reasonableness and into a
personal attack on another Foundation member. Please don't do this.
I am only on this list due to the benefit of sitting on top of Google's
pile of money, some of which we contribute to Gnome. I am too busy with my
own
For what is worth, I don't support the idea of getting Richard out of
the GNOME Foundation, nor the way that this idea is being discussed
and nor the suggestion of moderating his posts by default.
I disagree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your
right to say it
- François-Marie
Before the
holidays I kept receiving e-mails from him asking me to call it
GNU/Linux, and then to embrace the FSF when I explained that his
repeated mails harmed his message and that I would be more likely to
*not* say GNU/Linux because of his actions.
You said that you
Awaiting now the potential GMail was mentioned, Google is bad! reply.
You seem to be attacking me for things you imagine I might say.
At least it makes your bias clear.
And since you just raised the issue of GMail, shouldn't you have
changed the Subject field? Remember, the thread you're
Ok everyone. Now that both sides had a chance to attack each other and defend
themselves, and as Richard constructively agreed to try to remember to change
subject lines in the future, can we please put an end to this and neighboring
threads? I mean, don't you all have code to write?
Cheers,
Yeah, we should definitely have policy in place to keep some voices quieter
than others. An absolute must.
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 3:44 PM, Behdad Esfahbod beh...@behdad.org wrote:
Ok everyone. Now that both sides had a chance to attack each other and
defend
themselves, and as Richard
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 3:44 PM, Behdad Esfahbod beh...@behdad.org wrote:
Ok everyone. Now that both sides had a chance to attack each other and defend
themselves, and as Richard constructively agreed to try to remember to change
subject lines in the future, can we please put an end to this
Bradley,
No, this is not standard procedure. This should have been a private matter
and not something that should have been brought out in public. Regardless
of who it is, this should have been communicated privately with the list
owner. Stormy has done something similar in keeping things in
Hi,
Le jeudi 10 janvier 2013, à 12:36 -0500, Bradley M. Kuhn a écrit :
Is it standard procedure for credentials of Foundation members to be
discussed on-list like this -- particularly for existing members in good
standing?
For example, I don't recall my own membership being discussed herein
On Thu, 2013-01-10 at 12:36 -0500, Bradley M. Kuhn wrote:
Is it standard procedure for credentials of Foundation members to be
discussed on-list like this -- particularly for existing members in good
standing?
My question was a rhetorical one.
___
Would it be possible to set the moderation bit for Richard Stallman's
posts to GNOME lists? As Stormy pointed out, every time there's a
conversation about anything he jumps in and swerves off thread. This has
been going on for a very long time.
People in the GNOME Foundation are the last people
Heya,
On 09.01.2013 23:15, Andrew Cowie wrote:
Would it be possible to set the moderation bit for Richard Stallman's
posts to GNOME lists?
sure it would be. The list is managed by mailman and it has that feature.
As Stormy pointed out, every time there's a conversation about anything he
On Wed, January 9, 2013 5:28 pm, Tobias Mueller wrote:
Heya,
On 09.01.2013 23:15, Andrew Cowie wrote:
Would it be possible to set the moderation bit for Richard Stallman's
posts to GNOME lists?
sure it would be. The list is managed by mailman and it has that feature.
As Stormy pointed out,
I'm amazed by the concept of hijacking topics. I did not realize
that a topic was so valuable.
I said we should react to spyware _as we would_ to a crime. You
called my messages violent theft. Spyware is more grave than
posting a message, but your criticism is stronger than mine.
My alleged
Hi,
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 12:20 AM, Richard Stallman r...@gnu.org wrote:
Is there some practical reason why the Subject field makes a big
difference to you? Does it affect your mail reader's behavior
substantially? If changing the subject field helps people, I will try
to remember to do
Hey,
On Wed, 2013-01-09 at 18:37 -0500, Karen Sandler wrote:
On Wed, January 9, 2013 5:28 pm, Tobias Mueller wrote:
Heya,
On 09.01.2013 23:15, Andrew Cowie wrote:
Would it be possible to set the moderation bit for Richard Stallman's
posts to GNOME lists?
sure it would be. The list is
19 matches
Mail list logo
