On Wed, 2009-12-16 at 16:08 -0700, Stormy Peters wrote:
That said, the discussion started because of Clutter and its copyright
assignment and the fact that that is blocking it's inclusion in GNOME
2.28.
I'm not a lawyer, so I'm very ready for someone to just tell me that I'm
wrong, but:
(Sent via my phone; apologies for the formatting)
To clarify: Clutter (currently) comes with a copyright assignment. The
copyright waiver has been introduced for small patches attached to Bugzilla
to avoid going through the copyright assignment process.
The waiver and the assignment are two
Hi Murray,
On Thu, 2009-12-17 at 10:54 +0100, Murray Cumming wrote:
My concern is that code without a copyright holder cannot really be
under any license.
This is a very frequently made point; of course - IANAL. But if you
follow this argument to it's logical conclusion this makes all
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 2:43 PM, Luis Villa l...@tieguy.org wrote:
2009/12/14 Stormy Peters sto...@gnome.org:
Had a great GNOME Advisory Board meeting about events and copyright
assignments. The copyright assignment discussion in particular was very
dynamic.
Care to expand on that one?
*
http://blogs.gnome.org/foundation/2009/12/14/stormys-update-week-of-december-7th/
http://www.stormyscorner.com/2009/12/stormys-update-week-of-december-7th.html
***
Answered a lot of emails and had a lot of discussions. As for things I
actually crossed off my todo list:
- Updated CiviCRM
2009/12/14 Stormy Peters sto...@gnome.org:
Had a great GNOME Advisory Board meeting about events and copyright
assignments. The copyright assignment discussion in particular was very
dynamic.
Care to expand on that one? :)
Luis
___
foundation-list
