On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 3:49 AM, Dave Neary wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> The Tampere bid manifested their interest in carrying their 09 bid over
> for 10 - and the KDE board thought that was a good option. Given the
> alternative timeframe (which we're currently experiencing), they said
> "Good enough -
On Wed, 2010-02-03 at 09:49 +0100, Dave Neary wrote:
Hey!
> john palmieri wrote:
> > "Just do it" is the wrong attitude. We "Just did it" last year and it
> > was a mess.
>
> A mess is a little harsh. Let's say it reminded me of earlier
> conferences where some stuff fell through the cracks.
I
Hi,
john palmieri wrote:
> "Just do it" is the wrong attitude. We "Just did it" last year and it
> was a mess.
A mess is a little harsh. Let's say it reminded me of earlier
conferences where some stuff fell through the cracks. We had
organisational issues and communication issues, and (as you po
"Just do it" is the wrong attitude. We "Just did it" last year and it was a
mess. There was little integration at the conference, Nokia used it as an
event to pimp their decision to move from GTK to Qt and there were some who
wanted to take over decision making for the next years events before we
Le mardi 02 février 2010, à 12:33 -0500, john palmieri a écrit :
> I would like to point out that the survey was pretty narrow. For instance I
> said "do it" but I have the same reservations I had when I voted to not do
> it for this years GUADEC. I want to see this happen right, which is to have
On Tue, 2010-02-02 at 12:33 -0500, john palmieri wrote:
> I would like to point out that the survey was pretty narrow. For
> instance I said "do it" but I have the same reservations I had when I
> voted to not do it for this years GUADEC. I want to see this happen
> right, which is to have us col
I would like to point out that the survey was pretty narrow. For instance I
said "do it" but I have the same reservations I had when I voted to not do
it for this years GUADEC. I want to see this happen right, which is to have
us collaborate but at the same time keep our identities.
2010/2/1 Vin
Le lundi 01 février 2010, à 17:11 +0100, Vincent Untz a écrit :
> Le lundi 01 février 2010, à 10:39 -0500, Joe 'Zonker' Brockmeier a écrit :
> > On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 10:18 AM, Vincent Untz wrote:
> > >
> > > Is there anyone who would like to help create a useful summary of the
> > > results? I h
On 2/1/10 8:11 AM, "Vincent Untz" wrote:
>
> ...I'll just publish what I
> have and the raw results, so people could take a look and produce more
> interesting stats.
Sounds like the "open source way". =)
___
foundation-list mailing list
foundation-
Le lundi 01 février 2010, à 10:39 -0500, Joe 'Zonker' Brockmeier a écrit :
> On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 10:18 AM, Vincent Untz wrote:
> >
> > Is there anyone who would like to help create a useful summary of the
> > results? I have some stats already, but if you let me do this alone,
> > I'll likely o
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 10:18 AM, Vincent Untz wrote:
>
> Is there anyone who would like to help create a useful summary of the
> results? I have some stats already, but if you let me do this alone,
> I'll likely only present some less-effort stats ;-)
Depends on how time-sensitive it is. I should
Le samedi 23 janvier 2010, à 20:19 +0100, Vincent Untz a écrit :
> This new survey is quite short (only a few questions) and it shouldn't
> take more than 5 minutes to fill. So please take those 5 minutes and
> fill it. We'll close the survey next week, on next Friday (January 29th;
> I must admit
Hi,
Organization for GUADEC 2010 is well under way, with a great team doing
an amazing job! This is why the Board can already start thinking about
what will happen in 2011 :-)
We'd like to send a call for bids in the next few months, but before
doing so, we need to decide whether we want to co-lo
13 matches
Mail list logo
