Em 14-12-2009 00:26, Philip Van Hoof escreveu:
On Sun, 2009-12-13 at 13:34 +, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
Em 13-12-2009 12:44, Philip Van Hoof escreveu:
Richard's claim that proprietary is illegitimate is enforcement. He's
making a philosophic mistake that contradicts his own ideology
Hi!
Respect is earned, not due. You haven't behaved in a way that deserves
my respect.
Both of you: The Code of Conduct is in affect for the mailing lists, so
stick to it. That's even more important when you discuss about a Code
for the Planet...
Regards,
Johannes
signature.asc
Hi,
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 2:26 AM, Philip Van Hoof pvanh...@gnome.org wrote:
GNOME, both as a community and as a foundation, should teach the good
examples and critic the bad ones.
GNOME should stick to teaching the good examples. Criticizing the bad
ones is only counter productive.
Em 13-12-2009 12:44, Philip Van Hoof escreveu:
Richard's claim that proprietary is illegitimate is enforcement. He's
making a philosophic mistake that contradicts his own ideology of free
choice.
Choice of the master is not free choice for a slave. It only looks like
free choice to other
Putting aside, for a minute, the interpretations, elaborations and
rewordings, it's funny how similar the actual suggestions are:
Lefty says:
if any instances of
promotion of non-free software should actually occur, they can be dealt
with when they do, on a case-by-case basis.
That's a rule
On 12/13/09 7:24 AM, Ciaran O'Riordan cia...@member.fsf.org wrote:
That's a rule (a policy), which is mild and doesn't involve jumping straight
to blocking a whole blog. And it was suggested in heated opposition to this
comment:
No, Ciaran: you've removed the entire surrounding context, and
On 12/13/09 8:49 AM, Ciaran O'Riordan cia...@member.fsf.org wrote:
Yes. You said that no one's yet demonstrated a problem, and you gave a
solution for if the problem was demonstrated. You're solution was 100%
compatible with Richard's solution.
Except that we now seem to have had the
On Sun, 2009-12-13 at 13:34 +, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
Em 13-12-2009 12:44, Philip Van Hoof escreveu:
Richard's claim that proprietary is illegitimate is enforcement. He's
making a philosophic mistake that contradicts his own ideology of free
choice.
Choice of the master is
Em 11-12-2009 18:20, Brian Cameron escreveu:
If there is enough people to do a vote, that's great.
My vote: -1
I do not think that people should be discouraged from suggesting rules
for the GNOME community, and a reaction like leaving the GNU community
because Richard made a suggestion could
(I'm replying the two of you at the same time in an attempt at reducing
the thread's size)
On Fri, 11 Dec 2009 12:20:50 -0600 Brian Cameron wrote:
Richard's suggestion that a mild approach may be appropriate does
not seem over-the-top to me. Perhaps a mild approach could be
something simple
Philip:
On Fri, 11 Dec 2009 12:20:50 -0600 Brian Cameron wrote:
Richard's suggestion that a mild approach may be appropriate does
not seem over-the-top to me. Perhaps a mild approach could be
something simple like a disclaimer on planet...
I don't think Richard is suggesting that as mild
Em 12-12-2009 11:31, Philip Van Hoof escreveu:
On Sat, 2009-12-12 at 09:51 +, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
I have a personal blog and when I asked planet.openmoko.org to add my
posts, I gave them the RSS feed corresponding to posts under the tag
OpenMoko.
Perhaps it would be a simpler
If there is enough people to do a vote, that's great.
My vote: -1
I do not think that people should be discouraged from suggesting rules
for the GNOME community, and a reaction like leaving the GNU community
because Richard made a suggestion could be interpreted that way, I
think. We can
13 matches
Mail list logo
