On Sun, Sep 18, 2005 at 11:52:41PM +0200, Anne Østergaard wrote:
Points of importance for the future of the Foundation should not be
decided with 6 votes in favour and 5 against.
For the record, such a situation never happened in the past. There
have been issues where there was a relatively
Minutes of the Board meeting 2005 Sep 14
Attendance:
===
Owen Taylor (chairing)
Tim Ney
Daniel Veillard
Dave Neary
Federico Mena-Quintero
Murray Cumming
Regrets:
Luis Villa
Jonathan Blandford
Miguel
On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 12:48:33PM +0200, Vincent Untz wrote:
On Mon, September 19, 2005 12:07, Daniel Veillard wrote:
ACTION: Luis to post the Minutes of the meeting with the advisory board
- Done
Are there public minutes the members can see or is it only for the board?
(or did I
Dave Neary wrote:
By the way, I'm having trouble taking this mail as anything other than
a personal attack... ...
Dave, for what it's worth I thought Anne raised very valid points here,
and I took the message outside of any personal context. I agree with a
lot of what Anne said (not
Hi Anne,
I added some comments below.
Le dimanche 18 septembre 2005 à 23:52 +0200, Anne Østergaard a écrit :
By the way does the board have an agenda for each meeting? I have never
seen one! I miss this tool.
I believe so (although I'm not on the board ;-)). The agenda is probably
only sent
Le lundi 19 septembre 2005 à 14:16 +0200, Dave Neary a écrit :
Do you feel that you better represent the community's interests when
planning conferences or building teams, Or doing marketing?
I'm not answering the question since I'm unaware of the context.
I just want to highlight the
