Hi,
Jeff Waugh wrote:
quote who=Dr. Michael J. Chudobiak
I would suggest opening pgo as a free-for-all for those with commit access
Just so everyone knows: That is *extremely* unlikely to happen. There has
been significant support for the editorial stewardship of Planet GNOME for
ages
On 9/12/07, Tristan Van Berkom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That way you get democracy at both ends - posting and viewing.
GNOME is not democratic. :-)
Well, gnome is people that have a choice to contribute or not - making
those people (i.e. you me and everyone else) feel accepted and
Tristan Van Berkom a écrit :
I think its important to note here that giving someone access to blog
on planet gnome is like publicly aknowlaging that they are indeed a part
of the gnome community - people who contribute to the project need to
feel like they are part of the project.
Agreed. And
quote who=Tristan Van Berkom
*sigh*, I wonder what you are basing this claim on, maybe there's an
archived thread that you could reffer us to which details that ?
Unfortunately my blog didn't have comments at the time, so most of the
responses to this were on IRC or by mail. It's mentioned
Hi,
Julien PUYDT wrote:
Tristan Van Berkom a écrit :
I think its important to note here that giving someone access to blog
on planet gnome is like publicly aknowlaging that they are indeed a part
of the gnome community - people who contribute to the project need to
feel like they are part
On Wed, 2007-09-12 at 19:11 +0200, Dave Neary wrote:
At what point do we recognise that editorial control is necessary for
the planet to remain a useful resource?
OK. But please, could someone tell us what's this Editorial Control all
about?
How does this Editorial Control balances with the
On 9/12/07, Jeff Waugh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm just not going to get caught up in all this alarmism about censorship. I
can't imagine why anyone would think I could get away with actual censorship
of Planet... it would be laughable if it wasn't so mean spirited.
It is not true, but it is
On 9/12/07, BJörn Lindqvist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is not true, but it is not laughable. I don't for a second doubt
that you do not censor planet.gnome.org. But many months ago I emailed
you and asked to get my blog syndicated. I never got any reply and
left it as that because I didn't
On Wed, 2007-09-12 at 17:56 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
[...]
Planet GNOME without a strong editorial control would probably suck.
Just like maintainers vouch and check patches in each of their modules,
we need to have some control on blogs getting added to planet. And
that's Jeff's module...
On Thu, 2007-09-13 at 04:00 +1000, Jeff Waugh wrote:
[...]
It's also related to *why* people
want to be on Planet GNOME -- for instance, it sucks that some people make
blogs solely to be published on Planet GNOME.
Curiously, why does that suck ?
Not everybody likes to make a hobby
On Wed, 2007-09-12 at 12:21 -0400, Tristan Van Berkom wrote:
Well, gnome is people that have a choice to contribute or not - making
those people (i.e. you me and everyone else) feel accepted and important
is central to having a healthy project where everyone wants to be
involved.
But if
quote who=Steve Frécinaux
I'd even go one step further saying than most people care about gnome and
gnome apps, and not about one's cats and the other's culinar niceties.
Because despite Gnome is people, I think that for most people, Planet
Gnome is primarily about Gnome.
Well, that's
quote who=Federico Mena Quintero
The current editorial control is simply more or less if you ever did
something peripherally related to GNOME, you can be on Planet, regardless
of what you post.
It's somewhat more intricate than that -- I'm writing it up atm, so people
can understand the
quote who=Pascal Terjan
I think that asking people to have tags/categories on their blogs and not
aggregate everything would be better than having all the content of the
ones who arrived first.
Planet GNOME is about the people moreso than the project. We talk about the
project *all the time*.
quote who=Jeff Waugh
That's why full feeds are preferred over GNOME-specific tags
Minor point: I do mean 'preferred'. If someone has a good reason for wanting
only their GNOME-related posts on Planet I'm cool with that, but I always go
back to ask before putting them up. So no knicker-twisting,
On Wed, 2007-09-12 at 18:02 -0500, Federico Mena Quintero wrote:
On Wed, 2007-09-12 at 09:13 +1000, Jeff Waugh wrote:
quote who=Federico Mena Quintero
We have no editorial control. Get over it :)
We absolutely *do* have editorial control at the moment. The challenge I
have at the
16 matches
Mail list logo
