On Tue, 2007-11-27 at 23:34 +0800, Emily chen wrote:
> A LOGO FOR GNOME ASIA SUMMIT
>
> All ideas and propositions are welcome. We suggest the following basic
> principles :
>
> * Asia specific feature
> * the logo related to GNOME or gnome
> * simple
> Send your logo and int
> Microsoft isn't defending OOXML under the terms defined by ISO.
So we should be as grubby and corrupt as them? What I am saying here is not
that we should put up a weak fight. I am saying we should *defeat* OOXML
under the terms defined by ISO. I'm helping to do that in Australia. It is
in the
On Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 02:49:34AM +1100, Jeff Waugh wrote:
>
>
> > 1. Would you change anything in the GNOME Foundation statement about
> > OOXML?
>
> I'd probably include a message about not fighting OOXML on political grounds
> because they have no impact on the ISO standardisation process. T
>
>
> > 1. Would you change anything in the GNOME Foundation statement about
> > OOXML?
>
> I'd probably include a message about not fighting OOXML on political
> grounds because they have no impact on the ISO standardisation process. To
> succeed, we need to fight OOXML under the terms define
Where can I get more info about the specifications/requirement of the
logo..?
Thanks
Tim
http://dominor.com
Emily chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: A LOGO FOR GNOME ASIA SUMMIT
All ideas and propositions are welcome. We suggest the following basic
principles :
Asia specific
A LOGO FOR GNOME ASIA SUMMIT
All ideas and propositions are welcome. We suggest the following
basic principles :
Asia specific feature
the logo related to GNOME or
simple
Send your logo and interpretation to : [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
This logo will not only be used in GNOME
On Nov 27, 2007 11:52 AM, John (J5) Palmieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You are completely correct and I think the community can make the right
> choices here that 6 elected people can not. I do however think the
> foundation is well within it's power to make statements based on
> community expe
On Mon, 2007-11-26 at 16:31 +0100, Anne Østergaard wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-11-26 at 09:48 -0500, John (J5) Palmieri wrote:
> > On Thu, 2007-11-22 at 23:52 +0100, Anne Østergaard wrote:
> > > Questions to the candidates:
> > >
> > > Will you apply for the position as new Executive Director for GNOME
On Nov 27, 2007 7:20 AM, Gregory Leblanc
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Nov 26, 2007 2:54 PM, Luis Villa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Nov 26, 2007 10:28 AM, Richard Stallman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [snip]
> > > 2. How do you think the GNOME Foundation should support the Free
> > > Softwa
On Nov 26, 2007 2:54 PM, Luis Villa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Nov 26, 2007 10:28 AM, Richard Stallman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
> > 2. How do you think the GNOME Foundation should support the Free
> > Software Movement in general?
>
[snip]
>
> More long-term, working with the online d
10 matches
Mail list logo