> I don't believe Frederic was pointing at Miguel. There are people who
> have left the Gnome community working on products that don't use any
> Gnome technology posting blog post/ads for said product on PGO.
I wonder whether these products are free software.
If not, they certainly sh
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 6:49 PM, Richard Stallman wrote:
> > I don't believe Frederic was pointing at Miguel. There are people who
> > have left the Gnome community working on products that don't use any
> > Gnome technology posting blog post/ads for said product on PGO.
>
> I wonder whet
Le 08/12/2009 16:08, sankarshan a écrit :
2009/12/8 Pierre-Luc Beaudoin:
On Tue, 2009-12-08 at 03:23 -0500, Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
But I find it interesting to know, say, what Miguel is up to these
days. I don't think it's just me...
I don't believe Frederic was pointing at Miguel. There are
On Wed, 2009-12-09 at 08:19 -0500, Richard Stallman wrote:
> > I don't believe Frederic was pointing at Miguel. There are people who
> > have left the Gnome community working on products that don't use any
> > Gnome technology posting blog post/ads for said product on PGO.
>
> I wonder wh
On Wed, 2009-12-09 at 14:27 +0100, Frederic Crozat wrote:
> So, let's start (this is list done quickly by me and I haven't contacted
> anybody from it), as basis:
>
> - Robert Love
> - Christopher Blizzard
> - Miguel De Icaza
> - Nat Friedman
> - Daniel Veillard
> - Edd Dumbill
> - Glynn Foster
I don't agree at all with the current direction of the discussion. For me,
pgo is about people.
Yes, I'm interested to learn that Nat will soon get married. Yes, I'm
interested to hear about Mandriva on Frédéric's posts because I don't use
it at all but at least I keep an eye on it thanks to his
> about their work and appear on Planet GNOME. There's nothing wrong with
> that. Same goes for Nokia and many other companies involved.
I wonder if there's a misunderstanding here. No one said that companies
shouldn't be allowed to post.
Richard said that Planet GNOME shouldn't be used to prom
On Wed, 2009-12-09 at 14:07 +, Ciaran O'Riordan wrote:
> > about their work and appear on Planet GNOME. There's nothing wrong with
> > that. Same goes for Nokia and many other companies involved.
>
> I wonder if there's a misunderstanding here. No one said that companies
> shouldn't be allowe
On 12/09/2009 09:07 AM, Ciaran O'Riordan wrote:
about their work and appear on Planet GNOME. There's nothing wrong with
that. Same goes for Nokia and many other companies involved.
I wonder if there's a misunderstanding here. No one said that companies
shouldn't be allowed to post.
Richard
On 12/09/2009 08:48 AM, Lionel Dricot wrote:
I don't agree at all with the current direction of the discussion. For me,
pgo is about people.
Yes, I'm interested to learn that Nat will soon get married. Yes, I'm
interested to hear about Mandriva on Frédéric's posts because I don't use
it at all
Le mer. 09 déc. 2009 à 14:45:55 (+0100), Philip Van Hoof a écrit:
> This is nonsense. The planet-gnome slogan is:
>
> Planet GNOME is __ a window into the world, work and lives __ of GNOME
> hackers and contributors.
>
> This is what made the planet a successful project, initiated by Jeff
> Waugh
I think we are mashing together a bunch of issues. So, in effect, are
we looking for:
[0] a way to measure what could be appropriate content for Planet GNOME
[1] a way to prevent non-free or equivalent software being "marketed"
via the Planet
[2] a way to handle the consequences if there is eit
On 12/09/2009 01:47 PM, Dodji Seketeli wrote:
> The way I understand what Frédéric said is, there is an (yet another
> one?) interesting question not answered by the p.g.o slogan. "What does the
> planet maintainers do with people who stop being involved in the project".
>
> Sometimes people who a
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 12:48:45PM +, Lucas Rocha wrote:
> Before deciding on this, we thought it would be useful to get some
> feedback from the community.
Seems thread is becoming
1) heated
2) repeating
So, see subject.
--
Regards,
Olav
___
foun
On Wed, 2009-12-09 at 13:32 -0500, Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
> On 12/09/2009 08:48 AM, Lionel Dricot wrote:
> > I know some planets that choose to have a "code of conduct" about what
> > should be posted or not (like planet Ubuntu-f or planet-libre.org). They
> > all ended by not selecting the people
Is it possible to provide filters so that people who are interested in
different types of blog entries can focus on what is interesting to
them?
This could be a useful feature for many reasons, but it doesn't
address the issue of articles that grant legitimacy to non-free
software. Th
The people who work at VmWare also very often posted (and still post)
about their work and appear on Planet GNOME.
They should not do this, unless VmWare becomes free software. GNOME
should not provide proprietary software developers with a platform to
present non-free software as a good
> Richard said that Planet GNOME shouldn't be used to promote non-free
> software (i.e. software that denies freedom by witholding source code or
> witholding permission to use/modify/distribute).
But mono *is* Free Software according to the FSF definition!
Yes, it is. There's no
18 matches
Mail list logo
