Hi,
On 3 Mar 2010, at 09:09, Dave Neary wrote:
Proposed short-to-mid-term goal: Make the GNOME platform exciting to
alpha-dog application developers thought leaders.
We probably could have had MeeGo be GNOME Mobile, but our project
wasn't the obvious place to go, because we don't seem to
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 5:35 AM, Andrew Savory wrote:
Focusing in on one area that I can talk about: Qt is perceived by some to be
stronger from a business perspective due to the 'more complete' offering:
extensive documentation and an SDK.
Perhaps more focus on and promotion of GNOME's
On 3 March 2010 22:49, Richard Stallman r...@gnu.org wrote:
Sugar is a good thing, but it is a different interface -- is it
connected with GNOME?
Brian Cameron rather neatly explained the technical relationship as
'they use the lower parts of the stack'.
Steve Lee
OSS Watch
On Wed, 2010-03-03 at 18:46 -0500, Jud Craft wrote:
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 5:35 AM, Andrew Savory wrote:
Focusing in on one area that I can talk about: Qt is perceived by
some to be stronger from a business perspective due to the 'more
complete' offering: extensive documentation and an SDK.
Hi,
Jud Craft wrote:
In other words, I think I have to be an alpha-dog developer, and
nothing I've seen convinced me otherwise...
There's some confusion about what I meant by alpha dog developer which
I caused, obviously, so I should clear it up.
To make your platform successful as a
The combination of technologies going under the name HTML 5 have
made/are making web technology based applications finally competitive
with those built using conventional toolkits such as Qt, GTK+, and the
Windows and Mac equivalents.
If everything gets done inside or through
2010/3/4 Stormy Peters stormy.pet...@gmail.com:
c) Think about developing our own free web alternatives like identi.ca
did. I'd especially like to see an open alternative to Dropbox/Ubuntu One.
But there are lots and lots of web apps that people use regularly that could
use alternatives.
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 7:43 AM, Joe 'Zonker' Brockmeier j...@zonker.netwrote:
Technically, there is: iFolder. It has struggled quite a bit, but it's
still completely open and just waiting for someone to Do The Right
Thing and get it fixed up a bit and offer a service. The biggest
problem
On 3/4/10 5:46 AM, Richard Stallman r...@gnu.org wrote:
If everything gets done inside or through your browser, it would make
toolkits such as GTK and desktop environments such as GNOME obsolete,
except as platforms for a browser.
And if everything gets done on your desktop, it would make
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 9:55 AM, Stormy Peters stormy.pet...@gmail.com wrote:
GNOME is going to host Snowy. If that works out well, I think we should look
at how we could provide hosting to other free and open web services. (It
would have to include a plan for raising money for hosting. There
On 3/4/10 7:22 AM, Joe 'Zonker' Brockmeier j...@zonker.net wrote:
Somewhere in there should be a self-sustaining model to raise money
for the hosting and GNOME, and provide Free as in Freedom services for
users in the bargain...
It's a nice idea, but I don't see any self-sustaining model
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 4:11 PM, Lefty (石鏡 ) le...@shugendo.org wrote:
But, just so I'm sure I'm clear here, Mr. Stallman, it's my understanding
that you don't even actually _use_ the web, in any realistic sense, relying
instead on some congerie of email and a back-end rendering server to view
Hi all!
Looking at Anjuta, I have no idea if it's a great resource to start
GTK programming with or not. You say yourself presumably, and
that's the greatest nail in the coffin - you're obviously involved in
GNOME development and you have *no* idea, you're barely familiar with
it either.
On 3/4/10 9:07 AM, Gian Mario Tagliaretti gia...@gnome.org wrote:
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 4:11 PM, Lefty (石鏡 ) le...@shugendo.org wrote:
But, just so I'm sure I'm clear here, Mr. Stallman, it's my understanding
that you don't even actually _use_ the web, in any realistic sense, relying
2010/3/4 Lefty (石鏡 ) le...@shugendo.org:
Now that the blood have drained from the brain cells,
Okay, just for the record, that would be an unmotivated public personal
attack here. In case anyone's keeping score. Please note that I haven't
called anyone names.
You are right, please accept my
On Mar 4, 2010, at 12:09 PM, Gian Mario Tagliaretti gia...@gnome.org
wrote:
2010/3/4 Lefty (石鏡 ) le...@shugendo.org:
Now that the blood have drained from the brain cells,
Okay, just for the record, that would be an unmotivated public
personal
attack here. In case anyone's keeping score.
On Wed, 2010-03-03 at 04:35 -0600, Andrew Savory wrote:
Hey Andrew,
Focussing in on one area that I can talk about: Qt is perceived by
some to be stronger from a business perspective due to the 'more
complete' offering: extensive documentation and an SDK.
Perhaps more focus on and
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 3:00 PM, Richard Stallman r...@gnu.org wrote:
It seems to me there's a continuing need to 1) raise awareness about
GNOME, 2) raise money for GNOME, and 3) provide services around open
tools so users don't need to host their own servers, etc., to benefit
from
On Thu, 2010-03-04 at 17:45 -0800, Lefty (石鏡 ) wrote:
On 3/4/10 3:00 PM, Richard Stallman r...@gnu.org wrote:
Let's not be in a rush to invite users to use servers -- even our own
-- instead of their own computers. That is the wrong direction to go.
[...]
I doubt that as many as 10% of
On 3/4/10 6:08 PM, Liam R E Quin l...@holoweb.net wrote:
On Thu, 2010-03-04 at 17:45 -0800, Lefty (石鏡 ) wrote:
In any case, I'm under the impression that a search warrant or similar order
is generally required in the US to get information regardless of whether
it's from a hosted service or
20 matches
Mail list logo
