On 05/26/2011 01:49 AM, Andrea Veri wrote:
I'd like to ask two questions of all the candidates please:
1) As GNOME has matured the number of officially supported language
bindings has decreased. The quality and availability of various
language communities own bindings has varied wildly to say
On 05/26/2011 02:10 AM, Andy Tai wrote:
As Fedora is the only current GNU/Linux distribution adapting GNOME
3.0 as the default desktop, how would you facilitate to make GNOME
technologies to work well (meaning minimal local patching needed) on
other GNU/Linux distributions like Debian, and
Given that we already have a policy on copyright assignments[1], I
wondered what is your position regarding contributor agreements[2]?
Should the board do something with contributor agreements and if so,
what should be done?
[1] https://live.gnome.org/CopyrightAssignment
[2] e.g.
On 2011-05-26 at 12:01, Olav Vitters wrote:
Given that we already have a policy on copyright assignments[1], I
wondered what is your position regarding contributor agreements[2]?
Should the board do something with contributor agreements and if so,
what should be done?
as a developer and
1.) For incumbents, have you missed any meetings? What is your % of
missed vs attended meetings and why? For new challengers, how much
time can you dedicate to working on the board each week? How do you
plan on spending that time?
2.) Other open source / free software projects run their meetings
Andy:
On 05/26/11 04:51, Andy Wingo wrote:
You just used the name Richard Stallman as a token for this argument
is invalid.
You then proceeded to call someone stalinist; was it Richard? Was it
GNOME OS proponents? Unclear.
This was a poor attempt at humor, I guess. With my words I was
On Thu, 2011-05-26 at 12:01 +0200, Olav Vitters wrote:
Given that we already have a policy on copyright assignments[1], I
wondered what is your position regarding contributor agreements[2]?
Should the board do something with contributor agreements and if so,
what should be done?
[1]
On Thu, 2011-05-26 at 05:43 -0700, Jeff Schroeder wrote:
1.) For incumbents, have you missed any meetings? What is your % of
missed vs attended meetings and why? For new challengers, how much
time can you dedicate to working on the board each week? How do you
plan on spending that time?
As a
Le jeudi 26 mai 2011 à 05:43 -0700, Jeff Schroeder a écrit :
1.) For incumbents, have you missed any meetings? What is your % of
missed vs attended meetings and why? For new challengers, how much
time can you dedicate to working on the board each week? How do you
plan on spending that time?
I
Jeff:
On 05/26/11 07:43, Jeff Schroeder wrote:
1.) For incumbents, have you missed any meetings? What is your % of
missed vs attended meetings and why? For new challengers, how much
time can you dedicate to working on the board each week? How do you
plan on spending that time?
Overall,
hi Olav,
On Thu, 2011-05-26 at 12:01 +0200, Olav Vitters wrote:
Given that we already have a policy on copyright assignments[1], I
wondered what is your position regarding contributor agreements[2]?
Should the board do something with contributor agreements and if so,
what should be done?
Olav:
On 05/26/11 05:01, Olav Vitters wrote:
Given that we already have a policy on copyright assignments[1], I
wondered what is your position regarding contributor agreements[2]?
Should the board do something with contributor agreements and if so,
what should be done?
I am proud to say that
hi Jeff,
On Thu, 2011-05-26 at 05:43 -0700, Jeff Schroeder wrote:
2.) Other open source / free software projects run their meetings in
the open via IRC (such as Fedora's FESCO I believe). Would you
consider that, and if not, what about recording how board members vote
on a given topic. This
Andy:
On 05/25/11 13:10, Andy Tai wrote:
As Fedora is the only current GNU/Linux distribution adapting GNOME 3.0
as the default desktop, how would you facilitate to make GNOME
technologies to work well (meaning minimal local patching needed) on
other GNU/Linux distributions like Debian, and
hi Andy,
On Wed, 2011-05-25 at 11:10 -0700, Andy Tai wrote:
As Fedora is the only current GNU/Linux distribution adapting GNOME
3.0 as the default desktop, how would you facilitate to make GNOME
technologies to work well (meaning minimal local patching needed) on
other GNU/Linux distributions
On Wed, 2011-05-25 at 11:10 -0700, Andy Tai wrote:
As Fedora is the only current GNU/Linux distribution adapting GNOME
3.0 as the default desktop, how would you facilitate to make GNOME
technologies to work well (meaning minimal local patching needed) on
other GNU/Linux distributions like
On Wed, 2011-05-25 at 19:49 +0200, Andrea Veri wrote:
Forwarding to foundation-list two questions we received from
Ali-Reza Anghaie. Please don't add membership-committee@g.o
as CC, follow-ups should be kept on -list. Thanks.
Andrea
-- Forwarded message --
From: Ali-Reza
First: Since the issue of divisive attitude[s] such as Richard sometimes seems
to [promote?] when he talks about 'GNU/Linux' came up, I'd be interested to
know what, if anything, candidates for the Board propose to do to address the
ongoing waste of time and energy in the community over trivia
2011/5/25 Andy Tai a...@atai.org:
As Fedora is the only current GNU/Linux distribution adapting GNOME 3.0 as
the default desktop, how would you facilitate to make GNOME technologies to
work well (meaning minimal local patching needed) on other GNU/Linux
distributions like Debian, and such
On 2011-05-26 at 05:43, Jeff Schroeder wrote:
2.) Other open source / free software projects run their meetings in
the open via IRC (such as Fedora's FESCO I believe). Would you
consider that, and if not, what about recording how board members vote
on a given topic. This includes +1 / -1 /
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 5:01 AM, Olav Vitters o...@vitters.nl wrote:
Given that we already have a policy on copyright assignments[1], I
wondered what is your position regarding contributor agreements[2]?
Should the board do something with contributor agreements and if so,
what should be done?
On Fri, 2011-05-27 at 00:27 +0200, Gil Forcada wrote:
Hi members,
Everyday more and more services are offered on the cloud and there's
also initiatives powered by Free Software (tomboy on-line...).
One of the main problems for Free Software projects providing cloud
services is the
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 6:43 AM, Jeff Schroeder jschroe...@gnome.orgwrote:
1.) For incumbents, have you missed any meetings? What is your % of
missed vs attended meetings and why? For new challengers, how much
time can you dedicate to working on the board each week? How do you
plan on
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 11:38 AM, Lefty le...@shugendo.org wrote:
First: Since the issue of divisive attitude[s] such as Richard sometimes
seems to [promote?] when he talks about 'GNU/Linux' came up, I'd be
interested to know what, if anything, candidates for the Board propose to do
to
2011/5/25 Andy Tai a...@atai.org
As Fedora is the only current GNU/Linux distribution adapting GNOME 3.0 as
the default desktop, how would you facilitate to make GNOME technologies to
work well (meaning minimal local patching needed) on other GNU/Linux
distributions like Debian, and such
25 matches
Mail list logo
