Murray Cumming wrote:...
The fact that we are considering a referendum for this, even though it's
not strictly necessary, proves that we have difficulty reaching
consensus on stuff that can move us forward.
I disagree; this is the sort of important decision that IMO should
require a
Hi,
I +1 holding a referendum on this.
Christian
On Wed, 2005-09-14 at 21:01 +0200, David Neary wrote:
Hi all,
There has been some discussion on reducing the board size on the board,
and the one point which is clear is that this discussion should be in
public.
I'm in favour of
On Wed, 2005-09-14 at 21:01 +0200, David Neary wrote:
Hi all,
There has been some discussion on reducing the board size on the board,
and the one point which is clear is that this discussion should be in
public.
I'm in favour of reducing the board to 7 people. I would like to see us
El mié, 14-09-2005 a las 13:57 -0400, Daniel Veillard escribió:
...
Agenda:
===
* Region events (e.g. Brazilian Forum - Tim has been talking to
the organizers there, about a second one)
GUADEC is the main event but not everybody can go so we should encourage
local events, and
It sounds like increasing the size of the board by 3 people could
achieve both of the goals that Dave was talking about: to get more
things done, and to have more contested seats (provided enough people
decide to run so as to make a real contest).
___
