Hi,
Following on from Reinout's example, I'd like to reccommend votes for
the following candidates, some of whom are perhaps not as well known as
others:
* Vincent Untz - he's great. A nice guy, a great worker, and a born
leader. The kind of person you'd like to have on the board.
* Quim
On Mon, 2005-28-11 at 10:32 +0200, Baris Cicek wrote:
2005 Fall Board of Directors Election voting period is started on
November 27th. Ballots have been sent to foundation members. Voting
instructions are written in the mails you will be get. For this
elections you will have 13 candidates[1]
On Mon, 2005-11-28 at 06:49 -0700, Andreas J. Guelzow wrote:
On Mon, 2005-28-11 at 10:32 +0200, Baris Cicek wrote:
2005 Fall Board of Directors Election voting period is started on
November 27th. Ballots have been sent to foundation members. Voting
instructions are written in the mails you
On Mon, 2005-11-28 at 09:19 +0100, Dave Neary wrote:
Hi,
Anne Østergaard wrote:
The changing of the board:
I have been thinking that it might be an advantage to the Foundation if
the next board in fact took their seats immediately after the final
announcement of the list of
On 11/28/05, Anne Østergaard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Normally the old board can only do day to day business if needed. Once a
new board has been elected I think that it is the new board that should
rightly take all major decisions such as hiring new staff. At least
this is customary in all
I will be voting for Anne Østergaard also, because she too is a
supporter of the ethical ideals of free software.
___
foundation-list mailing list
foundation-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list
On Mon, 2005-11-28 at 09:42 +0800, Davyd Madeley wrote:
In all of this discussion about whether they are third-party
developers or independant software developers, I think people have
missed the important point.
That point is that we need to encourage traditional independant
software
[I removed all the cc]
On dim, 2005-11-27 at 13:48 +0100, Murray Cumming wrote:
On Sun, 2005-11-27 at 10:48 +, Bill Haneman wrote:
Nearly - though any new acronym can obfuscate. For that reason, I'd
suggest going with ISD, because of its similarity to the familiar
ISV, at least the
Vincent Untz wrote:
[I removed all the cc]
On dim, 2005-11-27 at 13:48 +0100, Murray Cumming wrote:
On Sun, 2005-11-27 at 10:48 +, Bill Haneman wrote:
Nearly - though any new acronym can obfuscate. For that reason, I'd
suggest going with ISD, because of its similarity to the
