Hi,
Žygimantas Beručka wrote:
The results are:
yes (125 votes)
no (22 votes)
Even though I've voted yes, the voting activity level is depressing I
must say. How many members the Foundation has currently?
Voting in referenda is generally not very high, and there was 0 debate
quote who=Dave Neary
Voting in referenda is generally not very high, and there was 0 debate on
this issue on the list (I did see some grumbling on IRC, but nothing
concrete), so it's hardly an initiative that's going to mobilise the
troops.
There was buttloads of discussion around the
Hi,
Jeff Waugh wrote:
quote who=Dave Neary
Voting in referenda is generally not very high, and there was 0 debate on
this issue on the list (I did see some grumbling on IRC, but nothing
concrete), so it's hardly an initiative that's going to mobilise the
troops.
There was buttloads of
What happens when you get less than 7 people with votes?
On 10/16/07, Dave Neary [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I have a suggestion for the coming board elections which I think might
make things more interesting (and, coincidentally, better).
We've always proceded by giving members N votes,
Hi,
Quim Gil wrote:
What happens when you get less than 7 people with votes?
I don't understand - you mean if there are fewer than 7 candidates?
Constitutional crisis, I suppose... everyone's elected, and they invite
specific people to fill up the board maybe?
That's unrelated to my
On Tue, 16 Oct 2007 14:53:28 +0200
Dave Neary [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Quim Gil wrote:
What happens when you get less than 7 people with votes?
I don't understand - you mean if there are fewer than 7 candidates?
Constitutional crisis, I suppose... everyone's elected, and they
On 10/16/07, Dave Neary [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Quim Gil wrote:
What happens when you get less than 7 people with votes?
I don't understand - you mean if there are fewer than 7 candidates?
Constitutional crisis, I suppose... everyone's elected, and they invite
specific people to
quote who=Dave Neary
Quim Gil wrote:
What happens when you get less than 7 people with votes?
I don't understand - you mean if there are fewer than 7 candidates?
Quim meant fewer than seven who receive votes at all (implying that there
would be other candidates running who received none).
Hi,
Quim Gil wrote:
What happens when you get less than 7 people with votes?
Excuse me, I think I misunderstood.
You mean, suppose we have 10 candidates, 150 voters, and the
distribution of votes is:
Candidate 1: 120
Candidate 2: 107
Candidate 3: 64
Candidate 4: 63
Candidate 5: 52
On 10/16/07, Dave Neary [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm certainly not against moving to STV, but that would need software,
and considerable retraining for members not familiar with the system.
http://selectricity.org/
open + easy.
___
foundation-list
Le mardi 16 octobre 2007, à 08:44 -0500, George Kraft a écrit :
Here is the balloting scheme used by the former Free Standards Group.
It was simple and I'm not aware of any resulting controversy.
In approval voting, each voter selects as few or as many
candidates for whom they wish to
Is it really a too difficult and too time consuming task to spend a
minute to cast one's vote in a fortnight for an average GNOME Foundation
member?
I had no strong opinion so I left it up to the others.
___
foundation-list mailing list
12 matches
Mail list logo
