Supporting GTK+

2009-08-05 Thread Bo Yang
Hi everyone: Recently I'm working on GTK/DirectFB, and I found a coding mistake (I think) at gdk/directfb/gdkgeometry-directfb.c:249. When dx or dy is negative, the destination point is calculated wrong. Directly use coordinates in dest_extents is just fine. B.R.! Bo

Re: Supporting GTK+

2009-08-05 Thread Pierre-Luc Beaudoin
On Tue, 2009-08-04 at 23:15 -0700, Bo Yang wrote: Recently I’m working on GTK/DirectFB, and I found a coding mistake (I think) at gdk/directfb/gdkgeometry-directfb.c:249. When dx or dy is negative, the destination point is calculated wrong. Directly use coordinates in dest_extents is just

Re: Supporting GTK+

2009-08-05 Thread Hubert Figuiere
On 08/05/2009 04:51 PM, Pierre-Luc Beaudoin wrote: On Tue, 2009-08-04 at 23:15 -0700, Bo Yang wrote: Recently I’m working on GTK/DirectFB, and I found a coding mistake (I think) at gdk/directfb/gdkgeometry-directfb.c:249. When dx or dy is negative, the destination point is calculated wrong.

Re: Supporting GTK+

2009-08-05 Thread Lionel Dricot
Could we imagine to fix the confusing gtk page pointing to this list once for all? Who is the webmaster of that page? Lionel Le mercredi 05 août 2009 à 16:51 -0400, Pierre-Luc Beaudoin a écrit : On Tue, 2009-08-04 at 23:15 -0700, Bo Yang wrote: Recently I’m working on GTK/DirectFB, and I

Re: Supporting GTK+

2009-08-05 Thread Sandy Armstrong
I believe Martyn Russell maintains the page. At least, he did when I asked about this in #gtk+ back in March. Like everyone, he's probably busy with higher priority stuff, but I agree that this situation is pretty annoying. :-) Sandy On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 2:01 PM, Lionel