On Wed, 2010-02-24 at 09:03 +, Martyn Russell wrote:
On 23/02/10 22:52, Philip Van Hoof wrote:
On Tue, 2010-02-23 at 16:53 +, Martyn Russell wrote:
Hi Martyn,
Don't be confused: most of this reply isn't directed at you personally.
Sure, but I will indulge all the same ;)
That's
On Wed, 2010-02-24 at 09:03 +, Martyn Russell wrote:
At some point you have to clean up your code base, that's been the
case
in every project I have worked on. I don't think it is a bad thing
that
GTK+ is released just more cleaned up, but others disagree and want
3.0 to have x, y and
Hi,
Richard Stallman wrote:
Software freedom is a means to furthering our vision of providing
technology to all, regardless of means, physical and technical
capability or culture.
Freedom can lead to more available technology, but it is vital in its
own right. It is little
Hello,
The GTK+ GSEAL work is almost done [1], and the cleaning work have
been started in the 2-90 branch [2]
I think that we only need more hands to do all the remaining job :)
The good news is that you don't need to be a expert to help removing
deprecated code or moving GSEAL'd members to
On 24/02/10 10:11, Murray Cumming wrote:
On Wed, 2010-02-24 at 09:03 +, Martyn Russell wrote:
At some point you have to clean up your code base, that's been the
case
in every project I have worked on. I don't think it is a bad thing
that
GTK+ is released just more cleaned up, but others
On Wed, 2010-02-24 at 11:07 +, Martyn Russell wrote:
On Wed, 2010-02-24 at 09:03 +, Martyn Russell wrote:
[CUT]
I think it is important to do releases when you have progress in the
project not just because you have some new shiny feature to give to
people.
I'm more in favor of
Hi,
Murray Cumming wrote:
On Wed, 2010-02-24 at 11:07 +, Martyn Russell wrote:
I think it is important to do releases when you have progress in the
project not just because you have some new shiny feature to give to
people.
Yes, releases are good, but we don't have to call them
On Wed, 2010-02-24 at 13:04 +0100, Dave Neary wrote:
Hi,
Murray Cumming wrote:
On Wed, 2010-02-24 at 11:07 +, Martyn Russell wrote:
I think it is important to do releases when you have progress in the
project not just because you have some new shiny feature to give to
people.
Hi all,
I think that this sort of discussion belongs to the gtk-devel mailing list,
besides, all of this nice to have have been discussed in the past
but none has actually stepped up to write actual code (as Martyn says,
everytime you start writting something, you hit the legacy wall).
The point
On Wed, 2010-02-24 at 12:41 +, Alberto Ruiz wrote:
Hi all,
I think that this sort of discussion belongs to the gtk-devel mailing list,
besides, all of this nice to have have been discussed in the past
but none has actually stepped up to write actual code (as Martyn says,
everytime you
Hello, folks.
I'm taking a look at http://foundation.gnome.org/about/charter/ , which
mentions it's still a draft, from Oct 2000!
Do we have a final version, or is it the final version so that it can be
renamed?
Cheers,
--
Jonh Wendell
http://www.bani.com.br
On 02/24/2010 01:05 AM, Richard Stallman wrote:
Software freedom is a means to furthering our vision of providing
technology to all, regardless of means, physical and technical
capability or culture.
Freedom can lead to more available technology, but it is vital in its
own right.
On Wed, 2010-02-24 at 11:16 +0100, Dave Neary wrote:
Hi,
Richard Stallman wrote:
Software freedom is a means to furthering our vision of providing
technology to all, regardless of means, physical and technical
capability or culture.
Freedom can lead to more available
On Wed, 2010-02-24 at 08:30 -0500, Dr. Michael J. Chudobiak wrote:
On 02/24/2010 01:05 AM, Richard Stallman wrote:
Software freedom is a means to furthering our vision of providing
technology to all, regardless of means, physical and technical
capability or culture.
2010/2/24 Juanjo Marin juanj.ma...@juntadeandalucia.es:
Possibly Alberto is right. Anyway, the original message of this thread
is that GNOME doesn't have long term goals. It seems that the
improvement of GTK attact a lot of attention.(BTW, Alberto's
presentation on GUADEC about this is
Em 24-02-2010 10:16, Dave Neary escreveu:
Richard Stallman wrote:
Software freedom is a means to furthering our vision of providing
technology to all, regardless of means, physical and technical
capability or culture.
Freedom can lead to more available technology, but it is vital
On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 13:04:44 +0100 Dave Neary wrote:
What features/removal of bugs are desired for GTK+?
Though that may seem boring and not shiny enough to excite people, my
personal number one missing feature is general purpose undo/redo
support at a low level in the stack.
Currently, some
Hi,
Juanjo Marin wrote:
Possibly Alberto is right. Anyway, the original message of this thread
is that GNOME doesn't have long term goals. It seems that the
improvement of GTK attact a lot of attention.
Proposed short-to-mid-term goal: Make the GNOME platform exciting to
alpha-dog
Hi!
I don't know if I'm an outlier, but what's always annoyed me about UI
programming in GTK+ is container widgets, and the need for me to worry
about them in the IDE. I don't understand why I can't drag drop
widgets, and have the IDE take care of deciding what container widgets I
need, and
19 matches
Mail list logo
