Re: Finance-related documents on two pages
On Fri, 2011-02-25 at 00:33 +0100, Vincent Untz wrote: > Le jeudi 24 février 2011, à 12:35 -0600, Paul Cutler a écrit : > > Hi Vincent, > > > > This seems like a good idea. Help is always is appreciated. ;) > > Any preference from the board (well, from Germán, I guess, since he's > likely the one who's going to update the future unique) for one of the > two pages? > > I'd think having all this on our website instead of the wiki would be > better, but I do understand it's much easier to update the wiki... After reading an insightful comment, I think the foundation website is better place for those documents :-) -- Germán Póo-Caamaño http://www.gnome.org/~gpoo/ signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ foundation-list mailing list foundation-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list
Re: Dropping TM when using GNOME Brand?
On 2 Mar 2011, at 15:26, Vincent Untz wrote: > I understand that as "it's okay to remove the TM in the two examples I > gave". If someone disagrees, shout loud :-) I don't disagree, but I'd say it might actually quite reasonable to keep it on the live CD boot screen where the user will see it both first and infrequently, but drop it on the desktop itself wherever we can. Cheeri, Calum. -- CALUM BENSON, Interaction Designer Oracle Corporation Ireland Ltd. mailto:calum.ben...@oracle.com Solaris Desktop Team http://blogs.sun.com/calum +353 1 819 9771 Any opinions are personal and not necessarily those of Oracle Corp. ___ foundation-list mailing list foundation-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list
Re: Dropping TM when using GNOME Brand?
Hi Brian, Done: http://live.gnome.org/BrandGuidelines I've added a small amount of generic advice on how to use the images. Feedback and review would be welcome. Best, Allan On Wed, 2011-03-02 at 09:47 -0600, Brian Cameron wrote: > Allan: > > Sounds good. Let me know when you have the page updated and I'll ask > the legal folks to give it a final look over to make sure the wording > is good. > > Brian > > > On 03/ 2/11 09:43 AM, Allan Day wrote: > >> I understand that as "it's okay to remove the TM in the two examples I > >> gave". If someone disagrees, shout loud :-) > > > > Thanks for the clarification. I'll add these notes to our brand > > guidelines [1] if that's OK. > > > > Allan > > > > [1] http://live.gnome.org/BrandGuidelines > ___ foundation-list mailing list foundation-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list
Re: Meeting Minutes Published - February 15th, 2011
Dave is looking for help in hosting a webinar type session (and you've reminded me to ping the AdBoard). The choice of codec is a crucial issue here. To avoid pressuring GNOME supporters to use nonfree software, the codec needs to be free. Also the site should not use Flash and it should work with Javascript disabled. -- Dr Richard Stallman President, Free Software Foundation 51 Franklin St Boston MA 02110 USA www.fsf.org, www.gnu.org ___ foundation-list mailing list foundation-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list
Re: Dropping TM when using GNOME Brand?
Allan: Sounds good. Let me know when you have the page updated and I'll ask the legal folks to give it a final look over to make sure the wording is good. Brian On 03/ 2/11 09:43 AM, Allan Day wrote: I understand that as "it's okay to remove the TM in the two examples I gave". If someone disagrees, shout loud :-) Thanks for the clarification. I'll add these notes to our brand guidelines [1] if that's OK. Allan [1] http://live.gnome.org/BrandGuidelines ___ foundation-list mailing list foundation-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list
Re: Dropping TM when using GNOME Brand?
On Wed, 2011-03-02 at 16:26 +0100, Vincent Untz wrote: > Le mercredi 02 mars 2011, à 09:09 -0600, Brian Cameron a écrit : > > > > Vincent: > > > > >A few years ago, it was agreed that it's fine to use the GNOME logo with > > >just GNOME instead of GNOME™: the trademark is still valid even if we > > >don't explicitly put the ™. Is this still valid? > > > > > >Use cases: > > > - GNOME logo during boot of the GNOME 3 live image > > > - GNOME logo in the System Information panel of the control center > > > - etc. > > > > I asked our legal folks this question, and they responded as follows: > > > > > Yes, it is recommended that you generally use the Tm, but in isolated > > > instances it's fine to go without. > > > > I hope this is helpful. > > I understand that as "it's okay to remove the TM in the two examples I > gave". If someone disagrees, shout loud :-) Thanks for the clarification. I'll add these notes to our brand guidelines [1] if that's OK. Allan [1] http://live.gnome.org/BrandGuidelines -- Blog: http://afaikblog.wordpress.com/ IRC: aday on irc.gnome.org ___ foundation-list mailing list foundation-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list
Re: Dropping TM when using GNOME Brand?
Le mercredi 02 mars 2011, à 09:09 -0600, Brian Cameron a écrit : > > Vincent: > > >A few years ago, it was agreed that it's fine to use the GNOME logo with > >just GNOME instead of GNOME™: the trademark is still valid even if we > >don't explicitly put the ™. Is this still valid? > > > >Use cases: > > - GNOME logo during boot of the GNOME 3 live image > > - GNOME logo in the System Information panel of the control center > > - etc. > > I asked our legal folks this question, and they responded as follows: > > > Yes, it is recommended that you generally use the Tm, but in isolated > > instances it's fine to go without. > > I hope this is helpful. I understand that as "it's okay to remove the TM in the two examples I gave". If someone disagrees, shout loud :-) Thanks, Vincent -- Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés. ___ foundation-list mailing list foundation-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list
Re: Dropping TM when using GNOME Brand?
Vincent: A few years ago, it was agreed that it's fine to use the GNOME logo with just GNOME instead of GNOME™: the trademark is still valid even if we don't explicitly put the ™. Is this still valid? Use cases: - GNOME logo during boot of the GNOME 3 live image - GNOME logo in the System Information panel of the control center - etc. I asked our legal folks this question, and they responded as follows: > Yes, it is recommended that you generally use the Tm, but in isolated > instances it's fine to go without. I hope this is helpful. Brian ___ foundation-list mailing list foundation-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list
