On Wed, 2012-12-12 at 18:10 +0100, Olav Vitters wrote:
> That is why there is a GNOME extension as well.
Then there's likely missing documentation about dependencies.
Currently no README file in the "Browse" extension would even tell you
that it comes from "GNOME". Hence non-insiders wouldn't kno
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 05:42:16PM +0100, Andre Klapper wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-12-12 at 17:24 +0100, Olav Vitters wrote:
> > > Would be helpful if Olav could outline that, yes. There's a raw codedump
> > > of some stuff at http://bzr.mozilla.org/bugzilla/extensions/ which is
> > > untested and non-w
On Wed, 2012-12-12 at 17:24 +0100, Olav Vitters wrote:
> > Would be helpful if Olav could outline that, yes. There's a raw codedump
> > of some stuff at http://bzr.mozilla.org/bugzilla/extensions/ which is
> > untested and non-working in its current state.
>
> Sure? It does work and I did do loads
On 12/12/2012 10:28 AM, Andre Klapper wrote:
> IIRC, when upgrading from 2.20 to 3.4 we received gracious sponsoring by
> Canonical to pay Max for this task.
> If nobody has plans to try, this might be something to defer to the
> foundation board in order to organize sponsoring?
A rundown of what
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 05:17:54PM +0100, Andre Klapper wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-12-12 at 16:48 +0100, Andrea Veri wrote:
> > Thanks for bringing this up Andre. I can try to work on the upgrade
> > but I never touched Bugzilla before since Olav was used to manage it.
> > I've searched around for the u
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 04:58:48PM +0100, Olav Vitters wrote:
> Do *NOT* touch Bugzilla. As mentioned before, there are *load* and
with the not touching I meant in case of an intended action of just
upgrading to a new vanilla upstream version.
--
Regards,
Olav
___
On Wed, 2012-12-12 at 16:58 +0100, Olav Vitters wrote:
> I'm not backporting any security fixes. Only did that while 3.4 was
> still maintained upstream.
Sounds like a potential issue to investigate by whoever feels like
wading through Bugzilla security annuncements for 3.6 and compare with
our 3.
On Wed, 2012-12-12 at 16:48 +0100, Andrea Veri wrote:
> Thanks for bringing this up Andre. I can try to work on the upgrade
> but I never touched Bugzilla before since Olav was used to manage it.
> I've searched around for the upgrade documentation [1] and it doesn't
> look like an hard operation.
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 04:48:43PM +0100, Andrea Veri wrote:
> Thanks for bringing this up Andre. I can try to work on the upgrade but I
> never touched Bugzilla before since Olav was used to manage it. I've
> searched around for the upgrade documentation [1] and it doesn't look like
> an hard oper
And the link:
[1] http://www.bugzilla.org/docs/4.2/en/html/upgrade.html
2012/12/12 Andrea Veri
> Thanks for bringing this up Andre. I can try to work on the upgrade but I
> never touched Bugzilla before since Olav was used to manage it. I've
> searched around for the upgrade documentation [1]
Thanks for bringing this up Andre. I can try to work on the upgrade but I
never touched Bugzilla before since Olav was used to manage it. I've
searched around for the upgrade documentation [1] and it doesn't look like
an hard operation. We should probably wait for Olav to provide some more
details
On Wed, 2012-12-12 at 16:06 +0100, Andrea Veri wrote:
> This was just a temporary measure until we upgrade our Bugzilla to the 4.2
> release.
Which brings us to the bigger question how to get GNOME Bugzilla from
3.4 to 4.2. I don't even know if somebody cares to check and backports
security upgrad
12 matches
Mail list logo
